Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7339
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by mustangxc »

Billy Joe wrote:Non-conference schedule way too hard. Next year's is brutal too. We must ease up on the non-conference schedule. It does more harm than good playing BCS teams that have had bulit in advantages over us for 20 plus years. We should be 3-1 going into conference play and not 1-3. Team morale is low and fans are already losing interest. Attendance will be much lower with a team with a losing record midway through the season than a team with a winning record. People in the AD's office that are responsible for this mess should be fired or kicked really hard in the groin area.
I am curious why you are such a big June Jones defender given how much vitriol you tossed at Doherty.
User avatar
Mustangs35SMU
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 13010
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Garland, TX
Contact:

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by Mustangs35SMU »

Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?
I have full confidence JJ and his supporters will come up with a valid excuse for losing to UTEP.
Image
User avatar
Junior
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11513
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by Junior »

Yet if we win the anti-JJ people will still be [deleted].
Derail the Frogs!
User avatar
Comet
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2392
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by Comet »

Junior wrote:Yet if we win the anti-JJ people will still be [deleted].
Not if we win convincingly with a good offensive performance. Then there might be hope that this offense is trending upward and is prepared to challenge for a CUSA championship. If we're not challenging that by year 5, June has got to go.
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by sbsmith »

Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?

"UTEP is really good, I think they could beat Baylor, A&M and TCU"
"Give the players more time, they're really starting to get it"
"That's okay, we never win in El Paso"
"1-4 is not that bad, we can still win the C-USA title"
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
SMU_Alumni11
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
Location: Somewhere near Knox

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by SMU_Alumni11 »

Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?
Reality hitting those who still support JJ in the face
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by SMU 86 »

Sounds like the new AD is going to lighten up the schedule in future years. :)

http://smu.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1417227
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by redpony »

Sounds like jj told him no real OOC games - just patsies that will make us look good. Guess that would leave out ULM, La tech etc. If we hurry maybe we can schedule UTSA before they can get competitive with us.
IIRC- hart also said no IPF in the near future.
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by SMU 86 »

redpony wrote:Sounds like jj told him no real OOC games - just patsies that will make us look good. Guess that would leave out ULM, La tech etc. If we hurry maybe we can schedule UTSA before they can get competitive with us.
IIRC- hart also said no IPF in the near future.
Looks like Coach Jones has an AD that has his ear. I do hope he puts more priority on the IPF as well.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by SMU 86 »

As far as coach after JJ retires, I would say UT Chat Coach Russ Huesman will be in the running.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by redpony »

at which time the CoC drops their financial support for a coach.
DiamondM
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1623
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by DiamondM »

redpony wrote: IIRC- hart also said no IPF in the near future.

Good, because our team clearly needs to practice in inclement weather so they can play games in them.
User avatar
goldenstang
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by goldenstang »

SMU 86 wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Yes make OOC schedule easier with teams no one in Dallas wants to watch. Great idea. The good news is by playing TCU, Baylor, and A and M is that we really know how far away we are from being a top 25 team. We had a reality check and it is not pretty.

We have to think wins more than attendance. JJ did say on TXA 21 that the job of the AD is to get the team to 4-0 in OOC.
F June for saying this, It is his damn job. Tired of him deflecting blame elsewhere.
User avatar
Billy Joe
All-American
All-American
Posts: 946
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:34 am

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by Billy Joe »

I support June Jones and think he has done a good job in getting us to 3 bowl games and winning 2 of them. I do not agree with how he handled the ASU fiasco and would not have been disapointed if SMU told him to leave. His ASU flirtation cost us a lot of recruits and other coaches are using it against him in current recruiting. I agree he needs to step it up in recruiting and hire younger assistants that are more aggressive in recruiting. I do not blame June for being 1-3. You cannot realistically expect us to beat Baylor and A&M when those schools have out recruited us for 20 years and had the benefits of being in a high profile BCS conference. We should of beat TCU and June's playcalling on the 1st and goal from the 1 was flatout awful and cost us a td. Wins and bowl games are much more important than trying to prove ourselves against programs that have been in BCS conferences for 20 years. I simply don't agree with the tough non-conference schedule - maybe after 5-6 straight bowl games but not now.
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling

Post by Rebel10 »

sbsmith wrote:
Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?

"UTEP is really good, I think they could beat Baylor, A&M and TCU"
"Give the players more time, they're really starting to get it"
"That's okay, we never win in El Paso"
"1-4 is not that bad, we can still win the C-USA title"

And one of the favorite June Jones to the death supporter sayings before a game to get everyone set up just in case SMU loses is that team really "scares me." :lol:
#HammerDown
Post Reply