For The Haters

ojaipony · Post by **ojaipony** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:03 pm

Our offense still outscored Houston - 45-42. So there.

HB Pony Dad · Post by **HB Pony Dad** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:49 pm

GiddyUp · Post by **GiddyUp** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:53 pm

With backup QBs - just something to note, could have changed things on the outcome/points.

Comet · Post by **Comet** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:25 pm

ojaipony wrote:Our offense still outscored Houston - 45-42. So there.

Technically, our offense outscored Houston's offense 45-35. Houston had a pick 6 so that's on their defense :p

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:28 pm

ojaipony wrote:Our offense still outscored Houston - 45-42. So there.

The "the sky is falling" crowd will never be swayed. Give up, I have. They'll never be happy.

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:38 pm

GiddyUp wrote:With backup QBs - just something to note, could have changed things on the outcome/points.

Their offense scored more points, including all 3 touchdown passes, with Crawford Jones in the game.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:32 pm

Junior wrote:
ojaipony wrote:Our offense still outscored Houston - 45-42. So there.
The "the sky is falling" crowd will never be swayed. Give up, I have. They'll never be happy.

I thought we scored 44 point off turnovers? I know we were given a short field a few times. UH out-gained our offense by almost 200 yards and we beat them by 30. Pretty unusual game IMO.

For The Haters

For The Haters

Re: For The Haters

Re: For The Haters

Re: For The Haters

Re: For The Haters

Re: For The Haters

Re: For The Haters