Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million per ye

Oliver · Post by **Oliver** » Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:18 am

Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.

Lol, good move for Tulsa, but that's a bit of stretch..

Kynd Tulsa Phan · Post by **Kynd Tulsa Phan** » Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:08 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?
By funding June's buyout while our boosters pay another coach

lulz

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:57 pm

Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?

The conference is basically the same. Not a whole lot of new teams coming to Ford in the next few yeas. Boise will be fun I guess but you cant really expect them to stick around long term for this.

MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.

There is absolutely no gold there. This is the best conference available.

lwjr · Post by **lwjr** » Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:00 pm

SMU_Alumni11 wrote:
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?

The conference is basically the same. Not a whole lot of new teams coming to Ford in the next few yeas. Boise will be fun I guess but you cant really expect them to stick around long term for this.

MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.
There is absolutely no gold there. This is the best conference available.

Unti the NBE completely falls apart.

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:33 am

Hopefully our athletic department didn't start spending any of that Big East money......

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:23 am

All in all we really haven't moved sadly. I was excited last season, now I'm just worried we are in the future FCS and the winner gets to play with big boys (ACC) lol. Or be doomed to useless meaningless bowls.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:28 am

We should win at least 6 games next year imo.

PurplFrawg · Post by **PurplFrawg** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:43 am

lwjr wrote:
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?

The conference is basically the same. Not a whole lot of new teams coming to Ford in the next few yeas. Boise will be fun I guess but you cant really expect them to stick around long term for this.

MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.
There is absolutely no gold there. This is the best conference available.
Unti the NBE completely falls apart.

Careful, now...

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basket ... a#comments

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:14 am

Not happening Frawg.

"I still think it will take a lot for them to split away," a league source said.

Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million per ye

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe