Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
- SMUfrat
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:15 pm
- Location: Dallas / Houston
- Contact:
Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=608572
I think the POD system would be cool. Just something to think about guys! Makes me think we need to respond to all this uncertainty be re-investing 100% in our athletics. Lets get our programs super-charged.
North
POD 1: Washington, Wazzou (Washington St. right?), Oregon, Oregon St.
POD 2: Stanford, Cal, Nevada, Utah
South
POD 3: Arizona, Arizona St. UCLA, Southern California
POD 4: Colorado, New Mexico, SMU, Houston
I honestly like the pod system. If there are 4 pods of 4 teams in a leage, you play everyone in your pod every year, and 2 teams from the other 3 pods, rotating teams, every year. This would up the conference unity I think. So if SMU and Houston Joined the PAC. SMU's Schedule would be like this:
1. Out of conference Game - Baylor
2. Out of conference Game - Texas Tech
3. Out of conference Game - TCU
4. Houston - POD 4
5. Arizona State - POD 3
6. Utah - POD 2
7. Wazzou - POD 1
8. Colorado - POD 4
9. Southern California - POD 3
10. Nevada - POD 2
11. Oregon - POD 1
12. New Mexico - POD 4
Don't get yourselves too excited. Just a thought / hope for SMU fans. Outside the PAC, I doubt SMU has many options purely because the ACC (Next best hope) has many schools wanting to be apart which are closer.
I think the POD system would be cool. Just something to think about guys! Makes me think we need to respond to all this uncertainty be re-investing 100% in our athletics. Lets get our programs super-charged.
North
POD 1: Washington, Wazzou (Washington St. right?), Oregon, Oregon St.
POD 2: Stanford, Cal, Nevada, Utah
South
POD 3: Arizona, Arizona St. UCLA, Southern California
POD 4: Colorado, New Mexico, SMU, Houston
I honestly like the pod system. If there are 4 pods of 4 teams in a leage, you play everyone in your pod every year, and 2 teams from the other 3 pods, rotating teams, every year. This would up the conference unity I think. So if SMU and Houston Joined the PAC. SMU's Schedule would be like this:
1. Out of conference Game - Baylor
2. Out of conference Game - Texas Tech
3. Out of conference Game - TCU
4. Houston - POD 4
5. Arizona State - POD 3
6. Utah - POD 2
7. Wazzou - POD 1
8. Colorado - POD 4
9. Southern California - POD 3
10. Nevada - POD 2
11. Oregon - POD 1
12. New Mexico - POD 4
Don't get yourselves too excited. Just a thought / hope for SMU fans. Outside the PAC, I doubt SMU has many options purely because the ACC (Next best hope) has many schools wanting to be apart which are closer.
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
I would die for a PAC invite since my brother is an ASU guy. It would make things a lot of fun.
- ponyinNC
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am
- Location: Wrightsville Beach, N.C.
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
Nevada and New Mexico aren't even on the new Big East's radar, and they are going to get invited to the PAC- 16/18 whatever it becomes? Not likely.
I doubt they dilute their brand that much.
Now, if they did HAVE to add 4, I could see them going for SDSU, Boise, SMU, UH as a group. This would obviously be years down the road, but it is possible.
I doubt they dilute their brand that much.
Now, if they did HAVE to add 4, I could see them going for SDSU, Boise, SMU, UH as a group. This would obviously be years down the road, but it is possible.
- HB Pony Dad
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
- Location: Huntington Beach, California
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
I can just see UC Berkeley, UCLA, Stanford, and USC drooling to invite Boise JC and the State School in San Diego to join them.
Nevada and New Mexico are laughable.
Even UH doesn't cut it.
If they really are interested in TV in Dallas and Houston they would be more inclined to look at RICE and SMU as they at least bring academics along with Texas TV.
Nevada and New Mexico are laughable.
Even UH doesn't cut it.
If they really are interested in TV in Dallas and Houston they would be more inclined to look at RICE and SMU as they at least bring academics along with Texas TV.
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN
FIRE JUNE JONES

USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
FIRE JUNE JONES

USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
I would die for a PAC invite just because I love the west coast so much.Comet wrote:I would die for a PAC invite since my brother is an ASU guy. It would make things a lot of fun.
- SMUfrat
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:15 pm
- Location: Dallas / Houston
- Contact:
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
I think we all could die happy knowing our school is getting PAID big boy $$$
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
so where were UC berkley, UCLA USC and Stanford when they added Colorado and Utah? How can they stomach being in a conference with Washington state, arizona, arizona state and other medium to poor schools? How could you even dilute that brand - it already sucks academically.
the snootiness of the pac whatever on academics is a joke.
the snootiness of the pac whatever on academics is a joke.
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
CU is such a better school than you're leading on above.
Some people simply forget just how bad it was...
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
those are all research schools. something SMU is not. we are at a disadvantage academically with regards to the PACgostangs wrote:so where were UC berkley, UCLA USC and Stanford when they added Colorado and Utah? How can they stomach being in a conference with Washington state, arizona, arizona state and other medium to poor schools? How could you even dilute that brand - it already sucks academically.
the snootiness of the pac whatever on academics is a joke.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
I'd argue that "academics," meaning the quality of teaching to actual students, has zero correlation with whether an institution is a "research" school. But I get your point.
- SMUfrat
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:15 pm
- Location: Dallas / Houston
- Contact:
Re: Mr. SEC''s view on SMU, Houston, Boise, and the PAC
SMU has altered their goals and mission to be a research oriented university. Seriously.
We have a perminent header on smu.edu about research. This helps our academic rating tremendously.
Guys, we ARE a fit academically for the PAC. The conference values forward minded universities... Progressive, etc...
The methodist church is the most liberal sects of christianity out there. We dont even need to take religious courses at SMU! TCwho and Baylor both do.
We would be ranked about 5th or 6th of the current schools academically. We just need to PRAY that they decide to expand and the big12 doesnt fall apart.
We have a perminent header on smu.edu about research. This helps our academic rating tremendously.
Guys, we ARE a fit academically for the PAC. The conference values forward minded universities... Progressive, etc...
The methodist church is the most liberal sects of christianity out there. We dont even need to take religious courses at SMU! TCwho and Baylor both do.
We would be ranked about 5th or 6th of the current schools academically. We just need to PRAY that they decide to expand and the big12 doesnt fall apart.