Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MWC

Cougar King · Post by **Cougar King** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:28 pm

Per McMurphy

The year of an AQ spot is tempting but the key to this is what happens after 2013...I'm split on this one.

gostangs · Post by **gostangs** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:35 pm

no. just no NBE is better then that.

Cougar King · Post by **Cougar King** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:48 pm

MHver3 ├óΓé¼┬Å @ MHver3

SMU and Houston to accept invites to the MWC.

@SFcal
Houston is one of the most valuable midmajor products. The MWC would be better to have them.

GreenbeltPony · Post by **GreenbeltPony** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:51 pm

Cougar King wrote:MHver3 ├óΓé¼┬Å @ MHver3

SMU and Houston to accept invites to the MWC.

@SFcal
Houston is one of the most valuable midmajor products. The MWC would be better to have them.

I wouldn't be surprised if this is true, but doesn't MHver3 usually just make stuff up?

Hoop Fan · Post by **Hoop Fan** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:54 pm

what does MWC do for us right now other than follow Boise around? this sucks.

Cougar King · Post by **Cougar King** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:59 pm

Hoop Fan wrote:what does MWC do for us right now other than follow Boise around? this sucks.

Following Boise around >>>>>>>>>>> sitting around with USM, Marshall, UTEP, UNT among others clawing for a way out.

Stefanie Loh ├óΓé¼┬Å@StefanieLoh
MWC Commish Thompson has spoken to 3-5 schools in last 24 hours as possible MWC entrants.

The last non-AQ schools to get invited to a power 5 conference came out of the MWC. Maybe we can drag Cincy along if we're all going in.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:02 pm

Offical MWC statement.

http://www.themwc.com/genrel/123112aab.html

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:03 pm

SMU and UH need to stay together but really the MWC and their late nite games nobody watches aren't great choices for SMU or UH either-BYU might make it more palitable

Cougar King · Post by **Cougar King** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:05 pm

Stallion wrote:SMU and UH need to stay together but really the MWC and their late nite games nobody watches aren't great choices for SMU or UH either-BYU might make it more palitable

TCU didn't play late night games. If we do go, I think they'll give us a deal similar to TCU's.

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:05 pm

We won't play one down in the MWC. Temporary affiliation on the way to PAC for SMU/UH.

GiddyUp · Post by **GiddyUp** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:07 pm

whatever happens, it will change in 4-6 months

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:09 pm

Has anyone twitted Rick Hart to get his reaction? :mrgreen:

BIGHORSE · Post by **BIGHORSE** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:09 pm

Changes aren't permanent, but change is. :wink:

Hoop Fan · Post by **Hoop Fan** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:10 pm

SMU 86 wrote:Has anyone twitted Rick Hart to get his reaction?

he probably doesn't know yet.

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:15 pm

MHver3 also says big 4 conferences leaving NCAA for football is imminent

Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MWC

Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MWC

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW

Re: Houston, SMU, Tulsa and UTEP are the main targets for MW