Where we have come from.

ponyte · Post by **ponyte** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:41 pm

Least we be reminded that once we were perpetual members of this group.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... -supremacy

Now, not only are we out of this group, but we only played one member in the final ranking. Sure, we didn't beat any really great teams (TCU, Baylor, A$M) but we also didn't lose to the worst in the land.

We are now where we want to be. But we are a long way from where we use to be.

DiamondM75 · Post by **DiamondM75** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:48 pm

And Tulane is on the waiting list with only 2 wins. I just can't imagine losing to Tulane.

No wait, yes I can.

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:52 pm

Actually Tulane was #2 on the list the week that they were 0-5 headed into our game against them.............

mustangxc · Post by **mustangxc** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:54 pm

Well then that is progress. If beating SMU gets you off the list for the rest of the season, then we have come a long way.

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:05 pm

ponyte wrote:
We are now where we want to be.

We are NOT where I want to be! I want to be a LOT better. How can you be content with where we're at?

mustangxc · Post by **mustangxc** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:08 pm

Junior wrote:
ponyte wrote:
We are now where we want to be.
We are NOT where I want to be! I want to be a LOT better. How can you be content with where we're at?

If you look at the text as a whole, it is clearly a typo. He clearly meant to say not.

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:07 pm

mustangxc wrote:
Junior wrote:
ponyte wrote:
We are now where we want to be.
We are NOT where I want to be! I want to be a LOT better. How can you be content with where we're at?
If you look at the text as a whole, it is clearly a typo. He clearly meant to say not.

Then you should clearly ignore my rant.

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:07 pm

I clearly don't read too good.

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:21 pm

Junior wrote:I clearly don't read too good.

*well

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:38 pm

Dutch wrote:
Junior wrote:I clearly don't read too good.
*well

my grammar not good neither

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:38 pm

Dutch wrote:
Junior wrote:I clearly don't read too good.
*well

i know. was joking around.

(clearly)

that's great raplh · Post by **that's great raplh** » Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:32 pm

I nev
R
Want to be there again

covok48 · Post by **covok48** » Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:35 am

Whoopdie doo. it now only costs us 2 million annually to do this and it took a fricken decade to finally get out of there.

It's progress I think, but we have to have better expectation than " hey at least we're not bottom 10 bad" every year.

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:09 am

Well I think what can bring some of the lets say overly postive thinkers down to earth a little bit is.... That UNT wasn't on the list including votes but Tulane who we lost to was. I'm glad when some drunk person who goes on there and was like "I wonder where did Tulane get two wins" they see we honored them.

Where we have come from.

Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.

Re: Where we have come from.