Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Harry0569 · Post by **Harry0569** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:18 am

Go ponies

SMU_is_bowling · Post by **SMU_is_bowling** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:21 am

Excited about today!

redpony · Post by **redpony** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:00 pm

I heard that we have lost two commits. Any idea who they are?

SMU2007 · Post by **SMU2007** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:52 pm

it's on rivals for free.

freddie johnson. william barnes.

SMU2007 · Post by **SMU2007** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:53 pm

freddie johnson is a non qualifier.

barnes is grayshirting. which I don't completely understand.

redpony · Post by **redpony** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:56 pm

thx for the info

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:14 pm

looks like they've deducted some points for our projected non-qualifiers and we are down to 74 on Rivals in Average and 80 in Total Points-so I say about the No. 77 Class right now. Remember all the posts about well looks like we are ranked No. 38 what's all the bitchin' about? The response was wait and see how far we drop

CA Mustang · Post by **CA Mustang** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:46 pm

Was watching ESPNU's NSD coverage and about 10 minutes ago they had SMU as the #5 class in the BE (ahead of Cincinnati and UConn). I don't know if that is an instant ranking or their overall ranking, but they must think we have a fairly competitive class for the conference.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:46 pm

I hope the 2014 class rocks.

LA_Mustang · Post by **LA_Mustang** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:47 pm

Hey, at least we got a model.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:48 pm

CA Mustang wrote:Was watching ESPNU's NSD coverage and about 10 minutes ago they had SMU as the #5 class in the BE (ahead of Cincinnati and UConn). I don't know if that is an instant ranking or their overall ranking, but they must think we have a fairly competitive class for the conference.

ESPN is counting Johnson, Moore, and Baxter in the class who are all non qualifiers. But even 5th is not that good in a conference of 10 unless we like mediocrity.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:06 pm

We may have a few players here and there, but I'm not at all pleased with this class. We need better.

CA Mustang · Post by **CA Mustang** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:12 pm

SMU 86 wrote:
CA Mustang wrote:Was watching ESPNU's NSD coverage and about 10 minutes ago they had SMU as the #5 class in the BE (ahead of Cincinnati and UConn). I don't know if that is an instant ranking or their overall ranking, but they must think we have a fairly competitive class for the conference.

ESPN is counting Johnson, Moore, and Baxter in the class who are all non qualifiers.

That explains it.

SMU 86 wrote:But even 5th is not that good in a conference of 10 unless we like mediocrity.

I didn't say it was great or very good. But assuming the BE is step up from CUSA, you first have to be comparable to your competition before you can surpass them.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:17 pm

I agree. It will be interesting to see how ESPN ranks us after they remove those names from the commitment list.

smustatesman · Post by **smustatesman** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:28 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:Hey, at least we got a model.

But will he strike a "Heisman" pose. If he does, it's Okie Doak, by me.

Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread

Re: Official SIGNING DAY Thread