Proposed NCAA football rules changes

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
User avatar
PonyPride
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 22576
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Proposed NCAA football rules changes

Post by PonyPride »

Pretty interesting - from USA Today:

The 10 football rule changes proposed by an NCAA committee

Paul Myerberg
USA TODAY Sports
12:45p.m. EST February 14, 2013

A rule to automatically eject players for targeting a defenseless player above the head and shoulders is one of 10 potential changes recommended by the NCAA Football Rules Committee, which met this week to discuss ways to increase player safety and "improve the game."

Of the 10 suggestions, the rule impacting targeting - like last year's rule moving kickoffs up to the 35-yard line - is the one gaining the most attention. Lost in the shuffle are several additional recommendations that could, if passed, produce a heavy change in the way college football is played.

Here's a breakdown of the committee's proposals:

1. Targeting. As noted, the committee unanimously agreed that in addition to the existing 15-yard penalty, a player should be ejected for targeting a defenseless player above the shoulders. As with fighting, a player who is penalized for targeting in the first half would miss the remainder of the game; if he is penalized in the second half, he would miss the rest of that game and the first half of his team's next contest.

To balance out the incidents where a player is unfairly penalized, officiating crews would be allowed to review the hit through video replay. Said the committee, the replay official "must have conclusive evidence that a player should not be ejected to overturn the call on the field."

Full story: The 10 football rule changes proposed by an NCAA committee
PonyFans.com ... is really the premier place for Mustang talk on the Web.
ΓÇö New York Times

https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/

twitter.com/PonyFans

https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/

threads.com/ponyfans_staff
User avatar
Junior
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11513
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Proposed NCAA football rules changes

Post by Junior »

what's the rationale on the spiking the ball proposal? did someone lose that way last year and now they're crying about it? what's next? no rushing TD's?
Derail the Frogs!
User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Re: Proposed NCAA football rules changes

Post by couch 'em »

Slowly trying to eliminate the kicking game, just like kickoffs?
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 32038
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Proposed NCAA football rules changes

Post by mrydel »

The original purpose of the spike rule was to save time. By using it in the last few seconds it becomes primarily a clock stopper and not a time saver so the original purpose is lost. The QB can still line up, drop back, and throw the ball out of bounds. But in the last few seconds the clock would run out and that is the way it should be. I have never liked the spike rule. It merely allows intentional grounding.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Post Reply