WordUpBU wrote:Grant Carter wrote:WordUpBU wrote:My opinion is that if SMU was backing out it should have done so a year ago. With that said it's a brutal slate and I understand why they want out. The only GIMMES in league play are Memphis and maybe UConn, USF, or Temple. Everyone else is going to be tough.
How far in advance did Baylor back out of the game a couple of years ago?
What game are you talking about? The 2011 game where we were FORCED to drop one due to the Big 12 losing teams? I imagine that would have been discussed in fall 2010 when it became known that we'd have to drop a game due to the Big 12 adding a league game.
The 2011 SMU game wasn't a voluntary choice. Realignment forced us to make a change due to the extra league game and we simply bumped the roadie at SMU game to the end of the series but will still play it unless I am mistaken. Most schools would take the road game away as you have to be a jerk to someone in that scenario. So drop TCU at home, drop FCS at home, or drop the road game and lose a home date? Pretty easy call for a money mindful AD.
\
Pretty defensive response, you did not seem to have any trouble understanding which game I was talking about. Which other game could I possibly have been talking about?
I was just asking how far in advance it happened since you had referenced the late notice in this case.
It seems like you do not know how far in advance it was discussed, you just imagine it was discussed in fall 2010. For all I know the announcement was made in the fall of 2010, much earlier than this is being announced, I just don't remember. It was an honest question.
Also, while you say it was not a voluntary choice, you contradict yourself in the rest of that paragraph by laying out the other games that could have been dropped. That sure sounded like a choice the way you described it. An easy choice maybe, but still a choice. Incidentally, I would not say Baylor was being a jerk in that scenario, but it is your school so if you want to call it that be my guest.