Actually the original U, the University of Chicago was a founding member of the Big Ten, but they left about the time my father was born--just how old is this guy?
Mexmustang wrote:Actually the original U, the University of Chicago was a founding member of the Big Ten, but they left about the time my father was born--just how old is this guy?
Here's why they are still important in the Big Ten:
birddogger wrote:We may be lesser than a few of the B1G schools, but U.Chicago ain't one of them.
LOL. This is what's wrong with our society when some people don't even know about one of the world's best universities, a university that focused on academics as its primary and sole focus that it voluntarily dropped out of the B10 but could probably name every program that made it to a bowl game or to the NCAA tournament.
I'm not ignorant. The University of Chicago is one of the top 10 universities in the country. But it is not in the B1G. That's what I meant. So why is Chicago relevant to a discussion of joining the B1G? Am I missing something?
birddogger wrote:I'm not ignorant. The University of Chicago is one of the top 10 universities in the country. But it is not in the B1G. That's what I meant. So why is Chicago relevant to a discussion of joining the B1G? Am I missing something?
All Big Ten members join the CIC which also includes U of Chicago. It's an academic consortium that does many things such as sharing resources, staff, and complete credit acceptance across all schools. In addition they use political influence in Washington along with peer review influence within the AAU to steer additional federal research money to member institutions.
It's a powerful group with UC, Northwestern, 11 "public ivies" (per the 2001 list), Nebraska, and Purdue in there.