Building....?

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Re: Building....?

Post by couch 'em »

Please elaborate on IPF plans that make it nicest in the country
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 32038
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Building....?

Post by mrydel »

It will include puppies.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Building....?

Post by gostangs »

not just puppies - cocker spanial puppies
User avatar
Silk
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Building....?

Post by Silk »

gostangs wrote:a few corrections:

1) there will be no structures at Pettus - it will stay a field and is not big enough for soccer
2) we are currently raising money for 5-6 major projects - so the IPF/soccer relocation/natatorium are all in the "next wave" .
3) soccer will go across central in nice new facility. IPF will go on current westcott and will be the nicest in the country - and will include track and field facilities
4) we are forever done with baseball. it aint coming back. we can stop talking about it. Lacrosse is much more likely
I hope you're right on a lot of this, but what makes you say all of this?

Hart says money isn't in place for IPF (yet), and if soccer was headed somewhere else, why would he have said it probably will go where Pettus is? In that case, wouldn't he just say something about how "we don't know yet where it will go"?

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=65610
User avatar
NavyCrimson
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3165
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)

Re: Building....?

Post by NavyCrimson »

Hate to see baseball go 'by-by' but whatever. I can understand the limited $$$ & available space but at least the sport brings in dollars & cents vs. lacrosse & the other olympic sports which are nil.

Screw Title IX.
Last edited by NavyCrimson on Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!

For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
User avatar
SMU2007
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5561
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am

Re: Building....?

Post by SMU2007 »

gostangs wrote: IPF will go on current westcott and will be the nicest in the country - and will include track and field facilities
I have a hard time believing this. Is there any truth to this claim?
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Building....?

Post by Water Pony »

SMU2007 wrote:
gostangs wrote: IPF will go on current westcott and will be the nicest in the country - and will include track and field facilities
I have a hard time believing this. Is there any truth to this claim?
I agree that it is hard to believe. Having the nicest in the country would require funding we apparently will struggle to find, especially for a private university.
Pony Up
fifty
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:51 pm

Re: Building....?

Post by fifty »

It will be the nicest in the county. In all seriousness though, it sounds nice. Everyone thinks SMU is a bunch of rich kids. Might as well live up to that and build something awesome.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Building....?

Post by gostangs »

it will happen - its just going to take awhile. we have a ton to raise with what is right in front of us - most of which is under construction.
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: Building....?

Post by CalallenStang »

ponyscott wrote:
Mexmustang wrote:Big time programs wouldn't have set themselves up for failure by having the non-conference schedule we had. The real question for [deleted] Hart is why he caved into A&M and instead dropped the home game against Baylor. We had a replacement game for them at JerryWorld against Louisville. I guess that makes A&M the one "afraid" to compete! It also questions the backbone of our AD!
Is that true? I thought Louisville wouldn't agree. Our AD seems like THE worst choice to navigate the difficult waters we find ourselves in. He doesn't appear to be a strong enough personality to lead SMU IMHO.
Louisville did not agree to the date A&M needed that game to fall on.
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Re: Building....?

Post by ponyboy »

SMU2007 wrote:
gostangs wrote: IPF will go on current westcott and will be the nicest in the country - and will include track and field facilities
I have a hard time believing this. Is there any truth to this claim?
I won't comment on how nice it will be or whether track and field will be included, but it's been the talk for a long time about the location of the IPF, i.e. at current Wescott.
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Building....?

Post by Water Pony »

ponyboy wrote:
SMU2007 wrote:
gostangs wrote: IPF will go on current westcott and will be the nicest in the country - and will include track and field facilities
I have a hard time believing this. Is there any truth to this claim?
I won't comment on how nice it will be or whether track and field will be included, but it's been the talk for a long time about the location of the IPF, i.e. at current Wescott.
Imagine an indoor 400 meter track surrounding the artifical field. Impressive combination for all student athletes. Break ground on the new Natatorium at Perkins site and the resulting athletic complex would be impressive.

However, this first requires relocating Track & Field and Men's and Women's Soccer somewhere. It will need to be east of North Central Exway near SMU Boulevard or south of Mockingbird near Glencoe Park.
Pony Up
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: Building....?

Post by CalallenStang »

Water Pony wrote: Imagine an indoor 400 meter track surrounding the artifical field.
Outdoor Track and Indoor Track are separate sports. So even if we did have a full-length indoor track, we would still need an outdoor track complex (unless we are going to drop outdoor track for indoor track)
User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Re: Building....?

Post by couch 'em »

Water Pony wrote:
ponyboy wrote:
SMU2007 wrote: I have a hard time believing this. Is there any truth to this claim?
I won't comment on how nice it will be or whether track and field will be included, but it's been the talk for a long time about the location of the IPF, i.e. at current Wescott.
Imagine an indoor 400 meter track surrounding the artifical field. Impressive combination for all student athletes. Break ground on the new Natatorium at Perkins site and the resulting athletic complex would be impressive.

However, this first requires relocating Track & Field and Men's and Women's Soccer somewhere. It will need to be east of North Central Exway near SMU Boulevard or south of Mockingbird near Glencoe Park.
Nice but hardly qualifies as "nicest in the country". More details?
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
User avatar
Roach
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: Building....?

Post by Roach »

CalallenStang wrote:Louisville did not agree to the date A&M needed that game to fall on.
That's what I heard, too. Louisville said no, and no other FBS team was willing to play A&M, making it impossible to get out of our game with them.
Plagiarize!
Let no one else's work evade your eyes.
Remember why the good lord made your eyes.
So don't shade your eyes, just
Plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize!

(Only be sure always to call it, please .... "research.")
Post Reply