Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

by **Pony ^** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:20 pm

I like our chances a lot now. Thoughts?

by **Pony147** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:35 pm

I like it. Where did you hear that?

by **Pony ^** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:05 pm

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com ... um=twitter

by **ponyscott** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:18 pm

Sorry that is not good news IMO.

by **Mustangsabu** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:29 pm

ponyscott wrote:Sorry that is not good news IMO.

I'm inclined to agree. But I only want him if LB really, really wants him and thinks he keep him on the court.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

by **Pony147** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:23 pm

That article paints a picture that I don't like...

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:24 pm

It's what we've known for awhile. There are demands that Tech must meet. If they fail to meet those demands, Frazier is ours.

by **Smerkins** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:15 am

If Tech hires this coach just to land Frazier. Wow. Incredibly shortsited.

by **Bergermeister** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:13 am

Frazier in Lubbock? Obviously, he has not visited Lubbock. Maybe he took a wrong turn and ended up in Nacogdoches. :lol:

by **ponydawg** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:57 am

"By Mike Graham / Texas Tech Special Contributor - who works for redraidersports.com", not saying he isn't going to tech, but the article might be a little biased due to who wrote it. I'm sure if it had been our rivals guy and not theirs, the questions and answers would have been more geared toward SMU.

Hope we pull it off.

by **Pony ^** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:05 am

Written by a Tech grad...of course it's not going to be biased towards us.

Education-SMU
Campus- SMU
Location- Triple SMU
Facilities- after renovations...SMU
Fan base- Tech. This could easily change
Coaching Staff- SMU
NBA Potential- SMU with the help of Larry and being in a NBA city
Raider Rash- Tech
Quality of life- SMU

by **CalallenStang** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:40 am

Conference - Tech.

This is where we have been hurt the most in recent months

by **1983 Cotton Bowl** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:45 am

Sounds like the writer really wants Tech to pull the plug on the search and hire Walker. Reading his piece, I almost get the sense he is grinding a pro-Walker agenda and using Frazier as a pressure point.

Making a coaching decision on the basis of one recruit's preference would be mindboggling to me. Talk about the tail wagging the dog! That being said, Tech's athletic department is so dysfunctional that they might be the mostly likely candidate to do it.

Of course, to be fair there is always the possibility that Tech would decide to hire Walker because they believe he is the best candidate.

by **friarwolf** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:50 am

Ease of Academic Workload: Tech

by **Junior** » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:01 pm

Bergermeister wrote:Frazier in Lubbock? Obviously, he has not visited Lubbock. Maybe he took a wrong turn and ended up in Nacogdoches.

i'd rather end up in nacogdoches than lubbock.

Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Re: Keith Frazier down to SMU or Tech

Who is online