The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 29127
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Charleston Pony »

maybe we should start beating Tulane more regularly before anyone puts them down

Aside from last year, June Jones is the only coach at SMU that has been able to beat them in football and we haven't exactly dominated them in hoops...and let's not even bring up attendance issues...we both have a long ways to go as small private schools in professional sports cities
PonyKai
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Here and there.

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by PonyKai »

I vote for attendance smack because compared to Tulane, we're totally a dwarf among midgets.
User avatar
PonySnob
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11516
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by PonySnob »

Charleston Pony wrote:maybe we should start beating Tulane more regularly before anyone puts them down

Aside from last year, June Jones is the only coach at SMU that has been able to beat them in football and we haven't exactly dominated them in hoops...and let's not even bring up attendance issues...we both have a long ways to go as small private schools in professional sports cities
Tom Rossley beat Tulane in 1991......
Peruna is my mascot!
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Water Pony »

Charleston Pony wrote:maybe we should start beating Tulane more regularly before anyone puts them down

Aside from last year, June Jones is the only coach at SMU that has been able to beat them in football and we haven't exactly dominated them in hoops...and let's not even bring up attendance issues...we both have a long ways to go as small private schools in professional sports cities
Agreed. As the saying goes, "people in glass houses should not be throwing stones." The attendance bar cannot be very high, when we choose to talk smack.
Pony Up
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12703
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by EastStang »

I think Tulane was instrumental in getting us into CUSA. I am certain that Turner probably was in the pro-Tulane camp.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
User avatar
PonySnob
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11516
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by PonySnob »

They have been ranked in the top 25 in football more than we have during the last 25 years........
Peruna is my mascot!
User avatar
Digetydog
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3913
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Digetydog »

Before anyone makes fun of Tulane's non-revenue sports, one needs to consider the fact that their campus was destroyed and many of their athletes moved to other schools permanently. Essentially, they had to start from scratch.
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
User avatar
PonyTime
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3985
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:01 am
Location: The Green Elephant

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by PonyTime »

Following the storm, priorities changed and athletics fell way down the list. The academics took over the University.

Sound familiar anyone?

Katrina's impact on Tulane was akin to DP+AKPye at SMU. Not exactly the same - but not all that far off. In SMU's case, a good portion of the school did not transfer out, just the football team.

As for the Tulane game that year - Matt Forte ran over our entire team that day. I really don't want to remember that game.
"Moral Victories Make Me Sick" - TR

Image
Mexmustang
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2993
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Highland Park, Texas

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Mexmustang »

"Tulane's football team didn't go to SMU. They went to Louisiana Tech."

They were here on the SMU campus. A number of us watched them! They later moved. Copeland (Copeland) and Turner then invited them to our game and provided tickets--they were laughing at our stupidity, not our hospitality--I sat with them with a major Tulane booster that later went to SMU from Tulane and was honored by our B-School as a distinquished SMU alumni.

They were laughing at us at our stupidity all the way to a victory against us in the same stadium.

I can assure you, depite an article at second rate Florida paper by a kid in his 20's, SMU was their major sponsor in the Faux Big East...how many here think Rice (or Tulsa at the time) is more deserving?

I am getting real tired of some of you youngsters that believe all things will be fixed by simply hiring a new coach--just remember, when Jones and Brown applied for the jobs, no one, no one trusted Turner and the disfunctional athletics at SMU. If they hadn't taken the jobs just who do you think would have accepted? These were the longest searches I have ever seen or been a part of in college athletics!
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Grant Carter »

Mexmustang wrote:"Tulane's football team didn't go to SMU. They went to Louisiana Tech."

They were here on the SMU campus. A number of us watched them! They later moved. Copeland (Copeland) and Turner then invited them to our game and provided tickets--they were laughing at our stupidity, not our hospitality--I sat with them with a major Tulane booster that later went to SMU from Tulane and was honored by our B-School as a distinquished SMU alumni.

They were laughing at us at our stupidity all the way to a victory against us in the same stadium.

I can assure you, depite an article at second rate Florida paper by a kid in his 20's, SMU was their major sponsor in the Faux Big East...how many here think Rice (or Tulsa at the time) is more deserving?

I am getting real tired of some of you youngsters that believe all things will be fixed by simply hiring a new coach--just remember, when Jones and Brown applied for the jobs, no one, no one trusted Turner and the disfunctional athletics at SMU. If they hadn't taken the jobs just who do you think would have accepted? These were the longest searches I have ever seen or been a part of in college athletics!
You lost a lot of credibility on the whole SMU getting Tulane into the big east when after months of you claiming that turner was the only big east president with a personal connection to Tulane, the Florida paper published texts from the UCF president to aresco in which the UCF president said the Tulane president was a personal friend. How do you explain being so wrong about that?
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7435
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by East Coast Mustang »

Ummm, also, Tulane is a significantly better addition than Rice. No one really gives a [deleted] about either's athletic program, but Tulane at least brings the conference exposure in a another significant media market. Adding Rice would have made zero sense considering UH had already joined. Let's just go ahead and put that to bed right now.
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7435
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by East Coast Mustang »

Also, a legitimate excuse to go to Nola for a weekend? This isn't even a debate.
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by CalallenStang »

Mexmustang wrote:"Tulane's football team didn't go to SMU. They went to Louisiana Tech."

They were here on the SMU campus. A number of us watched them! They later moved. Copeland (Copeland) and Turner then invited them to our game and provided tickets--they were laughing at our stupidity, not our hospitality--I sat with them with a major Tulane booster that later went to SMU from Tulane and was honored by our B-School as a distinquished SMU alumni.

They were laughing at us at our stupidity all the way to a victory against us in the same stadium.

I can assure you, depite an article at second rate Florida paper by a kid in his 20's, SMU was their major sponsor in the Faux Big East...how many here think Rice (or Tulsa at the time) is more deserving?

I am getting real tired of some of you youngsters that believe all things will be fixed by simply hiring a new coach--just remember, when Jones and Brown applied for the jobs, no one, no one trusted Turner and the disfunctional athletics at SMU. If they hadn't taken the jobs just who do you think would have accepted? These were the longest searches I have ever seen or been a part of in college athletics!
Yep, SMU got Tulane into the Big East, despite not having a vote until July 1, 2013.

The basketball schools controlled the vote. They had been looking for an excuse to leave for a long time. They added Tulane and then used them as an excuse to leave. Period.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Stallion »

Mexmustang is borderline crazy about his Turner hatred. SMU showed some class and sportsmanship by lending a helping hand to a university devasted by a Huricane. Yet he calls SMU's decision by Turner "stupidity". Its not Turner's fault SMU's football team got their [deleted] whupped by a team that clearly outplayed SMU. Only crazy people who have completely lost perspective place the importance of a football game over assisting Tulane after a natural disaster. Good for Tulane-they kicked our [deleted].
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: The real reason Tulane admitted to the conference?

Post by Water Pony »

I do not under MexMustangs obsession about this topic that few think is a significant issue, much less deserving the apparent wrath toward SMU administration. Besides opening our campus to a fellow private school after NOLA was devastated by Katrina seems as an appropriate and generous action. Continuing to reopen an non-issue seems strange to me.
Pony Up
Post Reply