leopold wrote:Whatever. Notre Dame found out their star QB cheated and publicly announced it. They didn't hide it, they aired their dirty laundry for all to see.
Good for them. Good luck to the kid for earning his way back.
I don't think they publicly announced anything of the sort.
CalallenStang wrote:
Um...SMU doesn't kick people out of school altogether for cheating
"deferred suspension" means that there's not an actual suspension for the first violation but rather a suspension that kicks in if there is another disciplinary issue
There are very few schools with single-sanction honor codes these days.
interesting.
I guess it would be more palatable if it were not for the apparent zero culpability of the previous handling of the sad sexual assault/suicide incident as well as the preventable death (negligent homicide? or something in that neighborhood) of their student videographer.
Because being publicly chastised, losing the starting position at possibly the most glamorous football program in the country and being taken out of school is 'token.'
I'm sorry, I don't have a problem with it. Good for them.
The most glamorous football program in the country ? Really. Yeah, they really deserved to have been playing The Tide last year......Hahahahaha
Smustatesman aka NUKE......I procreate and I vote.
SMUer wrote:Don't normal students get kicked out of school for such infractions...I'll pat ND on the back when they kick him out of school.
Often, schools kick kids out of school and allow them to come back after 1 year - see the Harvard cheating scandal.
If he got caught cheating and agreed to waive his rights regarding a hearing, a 1 year/semester suspension would not be unheard of for "normal" students.
Coach Kelly said that if Notre Dame reinstates Golson, "that's all I (Kelly) need."
Translation: Golson will apologize, take a class or two at a community college and Touchdown Jesus will forgive him, he will learn his lesson, and lo and behold, he'll be starting the first game of the year.
What I like is that if any of us did what he did, we cheated. When a high-profile athlete does it, he "used poor academic judgement." Life's fair.
"What kind of weirdo school are they running over there in Fort Worth?"
- Randy Galloway
ESPN Radio (103.3 FM)
CalallenStang wrote:
Um...SMU doesn't kick people out of school altogether for cheating
"deferred suspension" means that there's not an actual suspension for the first violation but rather a suspension that kicks in if there is another disciplinary issue
There are very few schools with single-sanction honor codes these days.
interesting.
I guess it would be more palatable if it were not for the apparent zero culpability of the previous handling of the sad sexual assault/suicide incident as well as the preventable death (negligent homicide? or something in that neighborhood) of their student videographer.
1) The local DA determined that there was insufficient evidence to charge the ND player. If the justice system can't convict someone, what makes anyone think a college is better able to determine what happened?
A few months ago, SMU kicked a student out of school after he was arrested for raping another man in a garage and a frat house. Later, the Dallas DA declined to charge him. Should SMU be commended for acting before the evidence came in? Was the Dallas DA right/wrong to drop charges? Did SMU do the right thing?
In my opinion, schools should leave criminal cases to the real justice system.
2). The video guy died after negligence by ND. While horrible, his death was the result of stupid conduct - not criminal.
