I posted my one comment over there, but refuse to be sucked in. The U of L commenters are certified mouth breathers. Now I realize why all of my UK friends hate them.
"smupony94: Harry, you have been promoted to purveyor of official status capabilities."
My biggest concern is still the offensive line. Ashcraft makes it better, but there's still some unanswered questions there, especially when it comes to depth.
Silk wrote:My biggest concern is still the offensive line. Ashcraft makes it better, but there's still some unanswered questions there, especially when it comes to depth.
At least we have starters returning on the OL, the DL has none. But I am also very concerned about the OL as well
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
The nice thing about the 3-4 is its flexibility. We will be stronger over all at the LB position and one would expect our D to adjust to highlight that position strength. D line is a question mark but not devastation. Shocked that our secondary, which is our traditional Achilles Heel would be a strength.
ponyte wrote:The nice thing about the 3-4 is its flexibility. We will be stronger over all at the LB position and one would expect our D to adjust to highlight that position strength. D line is a question mark but not devastation. Shocked that our secondary, which is our traditional Achilles Heel would be a strength.
Agreed....we have some stud LB's and let em loose!
Harry0569 wrote:I posted my one comment over there, but refuse to be sucked in. The U of L commenters are certified mouth breathers. Now I realize why all of my UK friends hate them.
This is very very very true. On the one hand, I hate that they are in the ACC. On the other hand, at least they will be fun to hate.