Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:04 pm

We have a decent chance at going 4-0 in OOC imo.

BigT3x · Post by **BigT3x** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:09 pm

blackoutpony · Post by **blackoutpony** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:13 pm

East Coast Mustang · Post by **East Coast Mustang** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:15 pm

If we go 4-0 OOC I will be on the Blvd for the Rutgers game in a thong.

With that said, we should go 2-2 OOC. Yeah, we'll be underdogs in 3 of the 4, but dammit it's time we pulled one out. JJ has burned off all of the political capital he had from the 2011 TCU upset

Pony Up

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:18 pm

Okay, okay what about 3-1?

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:20 pm

East Coast Mustang wrote:If we go 4-0 OOC I will be on the Blvd for the Rutgers game in a thong.

I for one would not want to see that. Especially after having eaten lunch. Therefore as indicated above I have revised my possibility to 3-1.

CenTXpony · Post by **CenTXpony** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:28 pm

I think 3-1 is a big stretch still but I'd be happy to be wrong...2-2 is a possibility though...

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:35 pm

i'd love to see Burcham get some reps in the second half against Montana St.

Would be nice to have a 21 point lead at half.

AusTxPony · Post by **AusTxPony** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:37 pm

You did see that Montana is #2 in the nation, in their division. I predict a tough first half and pulling away in the second.

MustangStealth · Post by **MustangStealth** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:38 pm

Before you get your hopes up too high.... remember that since Jones got here:

Only 5 wins against FBS teams in August and September in 5 seasons
1-4 in season openers (SFA was the win)
Average loss is by 26 points against FBS opponents in season openers

We are not a strong starting team. We have a better shot at winning our last 4 than our first 4.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:00 pm

the one game we kept close we were down by 20 late in 3rd Q. Yes we made a comeback-were in game for about 2 longshot plays

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:01 pm

3-1 is not my prediction. I am just suggesting it as a real possibility after reviewing the other schools issues.

gostangs · Post by **gostangs** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:15 pm

you do realize they dont have to play a man down....they get to fill that spot with another player, right?

BigT3x · Post by **BigT3x** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:39 pm

gostangs wrote:you do realize they dont have to play a man down....they get to fill that spot with another player, right?

blackoutpony · Post by **blackoutpony** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:42 pm

BigT3x wrote:
gostangs wrote:you do realize they dont have to play a man down....they get to fill that spot with another player, right?

+1

Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems

Re: Since Tech, aTm, and TCU are all have personnel problems