|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Rebel10 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:42 am
StallionsModelT wrote:I'd have no problem whatsoever with Tom Mason as the next HC. I think Mason would ditch the outdated R&S and run a more modern offense. I also think he's capable of putting together a solid staff of recruiters that have ties to Texas. We could do worse than Tom Mason.
I think Mason would keep most of the staff. No reason to believe he would fire his friends.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by Rebel10 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:45 am
East Coast Mustang wrote:StallionsModelT wrote:I'd have no problem whatsoever with Tom Mason as the next HC. I think Mason would ditch the outdated R&S and run a more modern offense. I also think he's capable of putting together a solid staff of recruiters that have ties to Texas. We could do worse than Tom Mason.
At a time when he need to make a splash nationally, raise our profile, and compete at the highest level to work our way up the realignment ladder, hiring Tom Mason would be a step backwards in my opinion. I think he's a great DC for us, but I don't see him as the right guy to lead our program going forward.
I think we will hire Mason. The argument will be so we can keep the continuity. In turn Mason will keep most of the staff in tact imo.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by mustangxc » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:45 am
East Coast Mustang: Who cares about making a splash if you can't get results? Just look at TCU and SMU. TCU made a very underwhelming hire in promoting Patterson and is now one of the it programs in college football. SMU made a very splashy hire in landing Jones and many on this board want to show him the door despite 4 consecutive bowl appearances because we are not landing better recruiting classes. If Mason can assemble the type of staff it takes to recruit DFW and Texas then I think he has earned the opportunity. We have been successful the last few years so it would be a smooth tranisiton that would maintain stability in the program. The biggest change would hopefully be seen in February and in subsequent seasons.
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by 1983 Cotton Bowl » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:46 am
PonyTime speaks truth.
-

1983 Cotton Bowl

-
- Posts: 1745
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:17 pm
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
by Rebel10 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:47 am
mustangxc wrote:East Coast Mustang: Who cares about making a splash if you can't get results? Just look at TCU and SMU. TCU made a very underwhelming hire in promoting Patterson and is now one of the it programs in college football. SMU made a very splashy hire in landing Jones and many on this board want to show him the door despite 4 consecutive bowl appearances because we are not landing better recruiting classes. If Mason can assemble the type of staff it takes to recruit DFW and Texas then I think he has earned the opportunity. We have been successful the last few years so it would be a smooth tranisiton that would maintain stability in the program. The biggest change would hopefully be seen in February and in subsequent seasons.
You think Mason would fire his friends on staff?
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by mustangxc » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:48 am
Rebel10 wrote:East Coast Mustang wrote:StallionsModelT wrote:I'd have no problem whatsoever with Tom Mason as the next HC. I think Mason would ditch the outdated R&S and run a more modern offense. I also think he's capable of putting together a solid staff of recruiters that have ties to Texas. We could do worse than Tom Mason.
At a time when he need to make a splash nationally, raise our profile, and compete at the highest level to work our way up the realignment ladder, hiring Tom Mason would be a step backwards in my opinion. I think he's a great DC for us, but I don't see him as the right guy to lead our program going forward.
I think we will hire Mason. The argument will be so we can keep the continuity. In turn Mason will keep most of the staff in tact imo.
I would be ok with keeping some on the current staff. I think at least half the staff would move on. Hopefully the ones that actually recruit would stay on and we would land some ace recruiters.
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by East Coast Mustang » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:54 am
mustangxc wrote:East Coast Mustang: Who cares about making a splash if you can't get results? Just look at TCU and SMU. TCU made a very underwhelming hire in promoting Patterson and is now one of the it programs in college football. SMU made a very splashy hire in landing Jones and many on this board want to show him the door despite 4 consecutive bowl appearances because we are not landing better recruiting classes. If Mason can assemble the type of staff it takes to recruit DFW and Texas then I think he has earned the opportunity. We have been successful the last few years so it would be a smooth tranisiton that would maintain stability in the program. The biggest change would hopefully be seen in February and in subsequent seasons.
Maybe you're right, I just think that Patterson is the exception to the rule. Look at other programs who have made the jump: Rutgers hired Greg Schiano, who before that was the DC at Miami Louisville- Petrino who was OC at Auburn, Kragthrope was a dud at UL but proven commodity at the time at Tulsa, and Strong who was long renowned DC at Florida Utah- Urban Meyer was 17-6 in two seasons at BGSU before being hired by Utah, and then Whittingham may have been underwhelming hire being promoted to HC but he'd been there for 10 years with results to speak for themselves (BCS bowl win). Not sure Mason has his kind of resume
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
-

East Coast Mustang

-
- Posts: 7432
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
by East Coast Mustang » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:57 am
I also thought we shouldn't hire Larry Brown though, so what do I know?
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
-

East Coast Mustang

-
- Posts: 7432
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
by mustangxc » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:58 am
East Coast Mustang wrote:mustangxc wrote:East Coast Mustang: Who cares about making a splash if you can't get results? Just look at TCU and SMU. TCU made a very underwhelming hire in promoting Patterson and is now one of the it programs in college football. SMU made a very splashy hire in landing Jones and many on this board want to show him the door despite 4 consecutive bowl appearances because we are not landing better recruiting classes. If Mason can assemble the type of staff it takes to recruit DFW and Texas then I think he has earned the opportunity. We have been successful the last few years so it would be a smooth tranisiton that would maintain stability in the program. The biggest change would hopefully be seen in February and in subsequent seasons.
Maybe you're right, I just think that Patterson is the exception to the rule. Look at other programs who have made the jump: Rutgers hired Greg Schiano, who before that was the DC at Miami Louisville- Petrino who was OC at Auburn, Kragthrope was a dud at UL but proven commodity at the time at Tulsa, and Strong who was long renowned DC at Florida Utah- Urban Meyer was 17-6 in two seasons at BGSU before being hired by Utah, and then Whittingham may have been underwhelming hire being promoted to HC but he'd been there for 10 years with results to speak for themselves (BCS bowl win). Not sure Mason has his kind of resume
In that case, how many programs have promoted their coordinators to head coach? If there is a long list of in-house promotions that prove to be failures, then you have a point. If not it is likely a timing issue. ie there was no opening to offer the coordinators at those schools, but there were openings at other schools.
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by mustangxc » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:58 am
East Coast Mustang wrote:I also thought we shouldn't hire Larry Brown though, so what do I know?
I was in favor of it from the start so there!!!! 
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by Rebel10 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:01 am
mustangxc wrote: I would be ok with keeping some on the current staff. I think at least half the staff would move on. Hopefully the ones that actually recruit would stay on and we would land some ace recruiters.
I think he would keep 90% if not all. Not just some imo. Again too many good friends on staff to really let anyone go imo.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by mustangxc » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:03 am
Rebel10 wrote:mustangxc wrote: I would be ok with keeping some on the current staff. I think at least half the staff would move on. Hopefully the ones that actually recruit would stay on and we would land some ace recruiters.
I think he would keep 90% if not all. Not just some imo. Again too many good friends on staff to really let anyone go imo.
That is something that I would discuss with him in the interview and make a condition of his hiring.
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by Grant Carter » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:33 am
Rebel10 wrote:mustangxc wrote: I would be ok with keeping some on the current staff. I think at least half the staff would move on. Hopefully the ones that actually recruit would stay on and we would land some ace recruiters.
I think he would keep 90% if not all. Not just some imo. Again too many good friends on staff to really let anyone go imo.
Who are his good friends on the staff? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
-
Grant Carter

-
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am
by couch 'em » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:44 am
What a disheartening thread. Here we make a national splash hire in bball, and see the wonderful results, and you want to promote a midgrade DC who cant stop the no huddle and keep most of a non-recruiting staff that has plateaued as an almost-champ of a mid major level conference. Do any of you want to actually win big?
"I think Couchem is right." -EVERYONE
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
by Stallion » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:49 am
The STAFF is the PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
|
|