|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by The PonyGrad » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:06 pm
Just scanned the roster and noticed how young the OL and DL positions are. The offensive line has 4 upperclassmen of which only 2 are seniors and 12 underclassmen of which 8 are freshmen. The defensive line has 2 upperclassmen and no seniors with 15 underclassmen of which 9 are freshmen. Given that I think I will be cutting them some slack until they get a bit more experience. 
Go Ponies!! Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
-

The PonyGrad

-
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: The Colony, TX
by The PonyGrad » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:09 pm
And SID, Jerry Seana is listed as a 0T (zero-Tee) instead of an OT (Oh-Tee) 
Go Ponies!! Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
-

The PonyGrad

-
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: The Colony, TX
by Nacho » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:11 pm
do you think the d-line will have a growth spurt?
-
Nacho

-
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
by mrydel » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:31 pm
The PonyGrad wrote:And SID, Jerry Seana is listed as a 0T (zero-Tee) instead of an OT (Oh-Tee) 
Doesn't that mean he has low testosterone?
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Stallion » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:33 pm
No that would be "No T"
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by The PonyGrad » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:39 pm
Nacho wrote:do you think the d-line will have a growth spurt?
Height of the d-line: 6-7 6-6 6-5 6-4 (6) 6-3 (3) 6-2 (3) 6-1 5-11 Not as tall as last year's starters but not tiny by any means 
Go Ponies!! Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
-

The PonyGrad

-
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: The Colony, TX
by Rebel10 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:10 pm
The PonyGrad wrote:Nacho wrote:do you think the d-line will have a growth spurt?
Height of the d-line: 6-7 6-6 6-5 6-4 (6) 6-3 (3) 6-2 (3) 6-1 5-11 Not as tall as last year's starters but not tiny by any means 
Height is not the issue as they are plenty tall enough. They are just lighter in weight than the past few iears.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by Nacho » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:39 pm
the montana st line line must average 7'4''
-
Nacho

-
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
by gostangs » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:53 pm
and about 400 lbs
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by LHS81 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:02 pm
probably need to test the Montana St OL/DL for "juice" 
2015 INDIANAPOLIS OR BUST
-

LHS81

-
- Posts: 3801
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:16 pm
- Location: Arlington,Tx
by Rebel10 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:02 pm
Our D Line will be giving up about 30 to 40 pounds per man from this point on probably.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by friend10 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:48 pm
I don't think the DL has played that bad considering their experience. I see our scheme as as problem especially our soft zone coverage. Seems like we need to get in bump and run man coverage so we can blitz more with linebackers. Worked against Tech & Montana State when we did it. Get burnt once in awhile doing it but it can also produce big plays and turnovers.
-
friend10

-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:33 am
by BUS » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:08 pm
I agree with my friend10. Disrupt to timing and give the line a chance. 7 plays on the TT drive was the same play with soft zone outside left. +7,+7,+7,+7,+7,+7,+7
Got to stop.
Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
-

BUS

-
- Posts: 7283
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Richardson, Tx usa
by friend10 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:26 pm
When we don't blitz we rush 3 against 5. Even with the size we had last year upfront it didn't work. Only way to disrupt the other team's office is to bring more people than they can block and hope their quarterback can't pick up open receiver. We have about 6 or 7 sacks through first 2 games this year. How many did we have last year through the same amount of games? (Montana State upgrade vs SFA) Our problem right now is turnovers. Have had a few chance w/fumbles and interceptions but didn't pull them off like last year. Play tighter on receivers and bring more pressure.
-
friend10

-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:33 am
by ponyscott » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:40 pm
Watching the new 4-3 Cowboy attack tells me maybe SMU should rethink the 3-4 defense....IMHO
-

ponyscott

-
- Posts: 7033
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:47 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests
|
|