Stallion wrote:I'll make it easy. I don't think SMU is a candidate for a P5 conference. I see no real tangible evidence that our fanbase can justify it or any demand that we achieve it. The lack of response from SMU fanbase to 4 straight bowlgames tells you everything you need to know. Some on this board will blame the administration-that's not SMU's problem right now. We won't be getting any breaks because we are a poor little private school and we won't be buying our ticket to a P5 conference just because we have some deep pocket alumni
We are 0-46-1 against B12 South opponents post-DP, with our average loss being by more than 30 points.
As this plays out, in the very near future, we will still be playing a Baylor, TCU, maybe Tech. We will have 5-year seniors on the field going against their 5-year seniors. During these seniors time at their respective schools, our opposition will receive ~$225M more dollars from their conference affiliation than we will from ours. How do we possibly compete (remember, we currently average losing by 30+ points now) And if we don't play these opponents, how do we sell season tickets or even get 15,000 to a game?
That is what's at stake here. That and what you think the cost to SMU would be academically and financially if we get left behind.
Within this context, I say who gives a rats [deleted] what the perception is of us retiring/firing JJ. I agree with LA, we could spin this as a positive if need be. Question is do we make one last push for inclusion. And while I agree the odds aren't great, nobody I know correctly called Rutgers going to the Big10. That was less than 1 year ago and is the same school that was passed over twice by the ACC.