I won't say "good game" SMU

gostangs · Post by **gostangs** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:42 pm

You are correct Johnny. This is the weakness of running a pass only offense with 2 star receivers. I actually feel sorry for Gilbert. He tried to force it in since that was all that available. He probably should start calling an audible and hand it off.

RGV Pony · Post by **RGV Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:43 pm

Yeah, sucks we ran fresh out of PB-recruited receivers

SMUer · Post by **SMUer** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:46 pm

Good luck on your 3rd win, TCU.

PonyKai · Post by **PonyKai** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:46 pm

RGV Pony wrote:Yeah, sucks we ran fresh out of PB-recruited receivers

Zing!

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:09 pm

CoxMustangFan wrote:Not a fair comparison. Today you saw a bottom half Big 12 team wake up and beat a bad and uninspired SMU team; in 41 days you'll see a top-notch SMU basketball program destroy the complete laughing stock of the Big 12.

I wouldn't call this year's bball team "top notch". We will be much improved and I expect a better than .500 season with a post season invite "somewhere", but don't expect giant steps or you will soon be calling for Larry Brown's head

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:15 pm

gostangs wrote:You are correct Johnny. This is the weakness of running a pass only offense with 2 star receivers. I actually feel sorry for Gilbert. He tried to force it in since that was all that available. He probably should start calling an audible and hand it off.

Thank you to you guys pointing out the real problem weak WRs in a pass happy offense. No offense leads to the breakdown of our Ds morale..

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:22 pm

granted our WRs have their issues, but I'm, tired of everyone defending GG as some great QB surrounded by incompetence. Just when Nlemchi is starting to feel it, he's isolated one on one with a defender on a little swing pass and GG throws it behind him...basically blowing up the play. That wasn't the only bad throw he made to an open receiver. This is an offense that is built on hitting guys in stride on those short passes He's been no more accurate than anyone we've had since the death penalty. He's just one more very average player on a very average team...that does not deserve to be playing in a BCS conference.

gostangs · Post by **gostangs** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:26 pm

He picked the wrong day to have his worst game that I have seen. He felt off all day - but some of that is excellent obviously downfield coverage.

He did nothing very well today either. His best throws were in 4th qtr after the game was basically over.

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:37 pm

gostangs wrote:He picked the wrong day to have his worst game that I have seen. He felt off all day - but some of that is excellent obviously downfield coverage.

He did nothing very well today either. His best throws were in 4th qtr after the game was basically over.

Yeah he probably in give up mode since averages getting sacked like 8-9 times a game. If I were him I would be forcing passes in hopes something actually happens since our WRs blow more than any other player on the team and sadly I'm including our offensive line.

jimhagle · Post by **jimhagle** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:40 pm

6 years and we still haven't found a decent QB-maybe ,just maybe Burcham might pan out. It was ridiculous to let GG play the entire game but I guess JJ didn't want to send Burcham in to the wolves.

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:42 pm

jimhagle wrote:6 years and we still haven't found a decent QB-maybe ,just maybe Burcham might pan out. It was ridiculous to let GG play the entire game but I guess JJ didn't want to send Burcham in to the wolves.

and that's exactly why Burcham should be getting some snaps in a game like this. let's see if he can make quick decisions under pressure and throw a catchable ball on target. If our "regular season's" hopes hinge on GG, why leave him in a game like that and risk injury?

aubreyfrog · Post by **aubreyfrog** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:46 pm

CoxMustangFan wrote:Not a fair comparison. Today you saw a bottom half Big 12 team wake up and beat a bad and uninspired SMU team; in 41 days you'll see a top-notch SMU basketball program destroy the complete laughing stock of the Big 12.

Maybe, but we will destroy the ponies in baseball and track.

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:49 pm

aubreyfrog wrote:
CoxMustangFan wrote:Not a fair comparison. Today you saw a bottom half Big 12 team wake up and beat a bad and uninspired SMU team; in 41 days you'll see a top-notch SMU basketball program destroy the complete laughing stock of the Big 12.

Maybe, but we will destroy the ponies in baseball and track.

We don't have baseball

cause of a bunch idiots rather have useless sports (not picking b-ball FYI) at our school...

LHS81 · Post by **LHS81** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:50 pm

aubreyfrog wrote:
CoxMustangFan wrote:Not a fair comparison. Today you saw a bottom half Big 12 team wake up and beat a bad and uninspired SMU team; in 41 days you'll see a top-notch SMU basketball program destroy the complete laughing stock of the Big 12.

Maybe, but we will destroy the ponies in baseball and track.

In 41 days, Larry Brown & the Mustangs are going to drill a new @zzhole on Trent (whatever his name is) and the Horny Toad 'lil dribblers!"

CoxMustangFan · Post by **CoxMustangFan** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 5:58 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:
CoxMustangFan wrote:Not a fair comparison. Today you saw a bottom half Big 12 team wake up and beat a bad and uninspired SMU team; in 41 days you'll see a top-notch SMU basketball program destroy the complete laughing stock of the Big 12.

I wouldn't call this year's bball team "top notch". We will be much improved and I expect a better than .500 season with a post season invite "somewhere", but don't expect giant steps or you will soon be calling for Larry Brown's head

You need to raise your expectations. I didn't call them a top 15 team, but since most of these "new" guys have been on campus for a year, they'll come out of the gates strong.

I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU

Re: I won't say "good game" SMU