I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:43 pm

Especially with TCU missing a couple of key players. I guess I have been reading to many of JasonB's dissertations and putting to much into the practice reports here.

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:46 pm

Rebel10 wrote:Especially with TCU missing a couple of key players. I guess I have been reading to many of JasonB's dissertations and putting to much into the practice reports here.

Guess their players with BCS offers are better than are players with few/no BCS offers...........

1983 Cotton Bowl · Post by **1983 Cotton Bowl** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:49 pm

Unfortunately, this teams just has too many shortcomings. Not seeing a bowl game this year. I'm particularly disappointed by the sheer number of mistakes and penalties.

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:57 pm

Patterson said that he played man to man because he did not think SMU's receivers were that fast.

RGV Pony · Post by **RGV Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:59 pm

Rebel10 wrote:Patterson said that he played man to man because he did not think SMU's receivers were that fast.

He was right and they ain't.

Good thing we've recruited 30 or so of em in the last 5-6 years

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:02 pm

TCU scored 41 points in the second half.

78pony · Post by **78pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:03 pm

Rebel10 wrote:Patterson said that he played man to man because he did not think SMU's receivers were that fast.

or able to catch or get separation or or or

RGV Pony · Post by **RGV Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:04 pm

Rebel10 wrote:TCU scored 41 points in the second half.

31 in the 4q

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:54 pm

they aren't very fast and they aren't strong to the ball either. Holman has shown some improvement but other receivers go up strong to the ball and catch some of these jump balls that he never comes down with

RGV Pony · Post by **RGV Pony** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:56 pm

Stallion wrote:they aren't very fast and they aren't strong to the ball either. Holman has shown some improvement but 3 star and above receivers go up strong to the ball and catch some of these jump balls that he never comes down with

Fify

shadowman · Post by **shadowman** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 5:02 pm

I was actually shocked that we were ahead at halftime...we need to be happy from that.

I actually thought we would lose by 50. TCU outclasses us man for man and three deep.

I was very proud of our defense playing above their heads in the first half. A couple of really good pressure moments against an young non traditional QB that can get flustered with an all out blitz.

The defense did a good job in spots.

But at the end of the day, TCU's athlete's are big time recruits, big 12 talent, and we are not.

Anyone that came into this game thinking we had a chance is seriously deluded.

Tommy 2A will always get pounded by Frank 5A. Just the way it is......

Like it or not, we are no where close to TCU.

I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points

Re: I did not think SMU would get beat by 31 points