Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:53 am

Good opportunity for the Mustangs. Go SMU.

StallionsModelT · Post by **StallionsModelT** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:55 am

Rutgers 42
SMU 13

MV pony · Post by **MV pony** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:57 am

Better perspective: No. 39 Rutgers playing no. 81 SMU.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:57 am

StallionsModelT wrote:Rutgers 42
SMU 13

Rutgers is nowhere near Texas A&M. Go SMU.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:59 am

Chickensh!t

StallionsModelT · Post by **StallionsModelT** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:02 am

Had A&M left Johnny Manziel in the game they'd have scored 80 points on us. The final score was nowhere near an indication of just how non-competitive we were in that game.

blackoutpony · Post by **blackoutpony** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:13 am

SMU 86 wrote:
StallionsModelT wrote:Rutgers 42
SMU 13
Rutgers is nowhere near Texas A&M. Go SMU.

Just stop it already. Sheesh

Harry0569 · Post by **Harry0569** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:21 am

Weakest based on what?

According to Jeff Saragrin, Rutgers is 53rd and we are 98th.

Granted we have played the 3rd toughest schedule and Rutgers has played the 155th toughest schedule, I still don't understand what weaknest means.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:36 am

I assume he means weaker than Tech, A&M, or TCU.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:49 am

SMU 86 wrote:Good opportunity for the Mustangs. Go SMU.

These posts are quickly becoming a joke. Let's acknowledge it will be difficult so that we aren't surprised with being unprepared on Saturday

StallionsModelT · Post by **StallionsModelT** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:50 am

Rutgers is also coming off a bye week while we are coming off consecutive weeks against A&M and TCU.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:06 pm

blackoutpony wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:
StallionsModelT wrote:Rutgers 42
SMU 13
Rutgers is nowhere near Texas A&M. Go SMU.
Just stop it already. Sheesh

Meaning Rutgers is not as good as Texas A&M.

PonyTime · Post by **PonyTime** » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:44 am

Vegas says it is. Line is down to 4 points at the Las Vegas Hilton.

AusTxPony · Post by **AusTxPony** » Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:32 pm

That is usually a good sign, and not being a betting man, I get to remain hopeful the team will put it together and win this one. Don't find that silly at all.

feelthehorsepower · Post by **feelthehorsepower** » Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:38 pm

The negativity in our forums is just like it is on our stands! No wonder we can't get off the ground! We just came from being 20+ years without winning seasons or bowl games. We have had winning seasons since 2009 and been to a bowl game almost every year since! I am proud of what we have done so far and I am excited to see what will happen as our program matures and gains national recognition and respect. We will beat TCU, Texas Tech and Texas A&M one year and I know we are getting closer to the breakthrough 12-0 Season. I believe SMU has the best package of all the schools in Texas to be extremely successful and a top 10 program: not even TCU, A&M or UT can match being in the CITY OF DALLAS, in the heart of the metroplex!

Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far

Re: Rutgers is the weakest FBS team so far