Proof of a staff that's quit

smusportspage · Post by **smusportspage** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:28 pm

Winning record. 109-79 at the college level.

smusportspage · Post by **smusportspage** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:36 pm

Stallion wrote:It's too bad you are so [deleted] ignorant about what went on around here for 2 decades. Play your little game-show your ignorance-June Jones would not have taken the job offered to his predecessors. He's admitted it. Therefore, the performance of his predecessors is essentially irrelevant because he never played under that Model.

You hurt my feelings Stallion.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:41 pm

Comparing (burnt) oranges to (burnt) oranges, Mack Brown has the greatest winning percentage of all Coaches in UT History in the modern era. What you are comparing is June Jones to the Ken Pye Model

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Te ... ll_coaches

smusportspage · Post by **smusportspage** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:57 pm

Maybe Texas is not as great in football as I perceived them to be. Sorry my bad.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:58 pm

His record at Texas is 154-45 for a .774 winning percentage

smusportspage · Post by **smusportspage** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:00 pm

Is that all it is?

Mustangsabu · Post by **Mustangsabu** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:06 pm

Stallion wrote:just checked-currently only 139 Texas High School recruits in the Class of 2014 are rated 3+ stars-so that's about half as many as in 2012 and 61 less than in 2013. They will upgrade probably back to 200

I'm not trying to underplay the importance of recruiting but what Stallion describes here is a deeply flawed ranking system, laughably so. Who says that there should be the same number roughly of 3 stars every year? And how do we suddenly rerank the kids? I want the biggest baddest studs playing, but I'll never buy into this star system.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:09 pm

go watch a World Cup qualifier-you are out of your league-go match football wits with ponyboy

LA_Mustang · Post by **LA_Mustang** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:09 pm

smusportspage wrote:Winning record. 109-79 at the college level.

at Hawaii: 7-10 vs. BCS teams (which I would love at SMU)
at SMU: 2-10 vs. BCS teams

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:23 pm

Mustangsabu wrote:
Stallion wrote:just checked-currently only 139 Texas High School recruits in the Class of 2014 are rated 3+ stars-so that's about half as many as in 2012 and 61 less than in 2013. They will upgrade probably back to 200
I'm not trying to underplay the importance of recruiting but what Stallion describes here is a deeply flawed ranking system, laughably so. Who says that there should be the same number roughly of 3 stars every year? And how do we suddenly rerank the kids? I want the biggest baddest studs playing, but I'll never buy into this star system.

Everyone mostly now is looking at the offer system not just the star system. We are severely lacking in that area.

smusportspage · Post by **smusportspage** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:27 pm

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:44 pm

Stallion wrote:go match football wits with ponyboy

Don't insult my friend like that.

Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit

Re: Proof of a staff that's quit