|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Stallion » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:22 pm
probably one of major reasons is that SMU's strength of schedule dropping like a rock-down 21 places in two weeks to 66th. Its going much LOWER in next 2 weeks with No. 158 (UCONN) and No. 140 (USF). SMU has played 1 team in Top 20 (A&M No. 11), 2 teams in Top 50 (Texas Tech No. 44). 3 teams in Top 75 (TCU No. 68) http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
Last edited by Stallion on Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by mrydel » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:34 pm
Hey! We dodged playing one also. That should give us some points.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by SMU_Alumni11 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:41 pm
Man talk about turn of events. It looked like AM and Tech were going to be top contenders and dropping Baylor hurt the strength of schedule. Should have dropped AM there's no benefit to playing them. None of their fans come and when we go there we get thrown around. Baylor at home would have been fun I think.
-

SMU_Alumni11

-
- Posts: 3654
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
- Location: Somewhere near Knox
by Dukie » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:14 pm
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Man talk about turn of events. It looked like AM and Tech were going to be top contenders and dropping Baylor hurt the strength of schedule. Should have dropped AM there's no benefit to playing them. None of their fans come and when we go there we get thrown around. Baylor at home would have been fun I think.
You do pay attention around here, right? There were many credible reports that SMU tried to drop A&M but could not.
-
Dukie

-
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas
by Stallion » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:17 pm
Close Victories over No. 95 Memphis No. 125 Montana St. No. 131 Temple
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by SMU_Alumni11 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:46 pm
Dukie wrote:SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Man talk about turn of events. It looked like AM and Tech were going to be top contenders and dropping Baylor hurt the strength of schedule. Should have dropped AM there's no benefit to playing them. None of their fans come and when we go there we get thrown around. Baylor at home would have been fun I think.
You do pay attention around here, right? There were many credible reports that SMU tried to drop A&M but could not.
Sure but they should have found some way anyway. Otherwise oh well, the past is the past. Its a shame that tech has been playing so poorly... And AM isn't as hot as last year.
-

SMU_Alumni11

-
- Posts: 3654
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
- Location: Somewhere near Knox
by PonySnob » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:49 pm
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Dukie wrote:SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Man talk about turn of events. It looked like AM and Tech were going to be top contenders and dropping Baylor hurt the strength of schedule. Should have dropped AM there's no benefit to playing them. None of their fans come and when we go there we get thrown around. Baylor at home would have been fun I think.
You do pay attention around here, right? There were many credible reports that SMU tried to drop A&M but could not.
Sure but they should have found some way anyway. Otherwise oh well, the past is the past. Its a shame that tech has been playing so poorly... And AM isn't as hot as last year.
We aren't helping any of our opponents "strength of schedule" either.......
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Treadway21 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:54 pm
Stallion please stop with the stats; yesterday was bad enough. I was hoping for a day off of bad SMU news.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-

Treadway21

-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by blackoutpony » Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:54 pm
Andddddddddddd for my 1,000th post, I will just say this.
FIRE JUNE JONES.
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
-

blackoutpony

-
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
- Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye
by LHS81 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:08 pm
"Top 125 in everything we do"
2015 INDIANAPOLIS OR BUST
-

LHS81

-
- Posts: 3801
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:16 pm
- Location: Arlington,Tx
by feelthehorsepower » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:23 pm
blackoutpony wrote:Andddddddddddd for my 1,000th post, I will just say this.
FIRE JUNE JONES.
I would start with RGT....
-

feelthehorsepower

-
- Posts: 1518
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:38 pm
- Location: Ponytown, USA (Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex)
by SMU_Alumni11 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:30 pm
Ponysnob, that's definitely the truth, maybe one day we will actually make other teams rankings go up when we win rather than down. BoP totally agree as I would hope the majority of fans would want him fired and his entire staff. I can't say this was embarrassing loss like the OCC games were but this and Rutgers should have been wins. If he was able to get a team out there that could play 4 quarters we would be 5-3 or heck even 7-1 since tech and TCU could have been winnable games if we played with discipline.
We have to play 4 quarters of good offense and at least get some shutout defense if we have any hope of beating cougar high or Mickey mouse U..
For me, I'm not going to be as emotionally attach to the games since it looks like a 5-7 season based on past performance. I'll be at the home games but its just going to feel like the season is over. Thanks JJ.
-

SMU_Alumni11

-
- Posts: 3654
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
- Location: Somewhere near Knox
by feelthehorsepower » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:35 pm
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Ponysnob, that's definitely the truth, maybe one day we will actually make other teams rankings go up when we win rather than down. BoP totally agree as I would hope the majority of fans would want him fired and his entire staff. I can't say this was embarrassing loss like the OCC games were but this and Rutgers should have been wins. If he was able to get a team out there that could play 4 quarters we would be 5-3 or heck even 7-1 since tech and TCU could have been winnable games if we played with discipline.
We have to play 4 quarters of good offense and at least get some shutout defense if we have any hope of beating cougar high or Mickey mouse U..
For me, I'm not going to be as emotionally attach to the games since it looks like a 5-7 season based on past performance. I'll be at the home games but its just going to feel like the season is over. Thanks JJ.
Tech is smoke and mirrors, we were supposed to beat them, even Vegas put them -2.5 coming into that game. TCU's offense is inexistent. HORRIBLE! There is no excuse in letting them put 48 on us. TCU should have been a win. Sadly, this was the year to beat them, because once they start getting Big 12 talent (they are arguably one of the hottest programs in the Big 12, even while losing, Oh and they compete vs Texas in recruiting) they will have Big 12 depth and we will never beat them again.
-

feelthehorsepower

-
- Posts: 1518
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:38 pm
- Location: Ponytown, USA (Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex)
by SMUer » Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:45 pm
That Memphis win looks "gritty" now...
-

SMUer

-
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America
by blackoutpony » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:57 pm
feelthehorsepower wrote:SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Ponysnob, that's definitely the truth, maybe one day we will actually make other teams rankings go up when we win rather than down. BoP totally agree as I would hope the majority of fans would want him fired and his entire staff. I can't say this was embarrassing loss like the OCC games were but this and Rutgers should have been wins. If he was able to get a team out there that could play 4 quarters we would be 5-3 or heck even 7-1 since tech and TCU could have been winnable games if we played with discipline.
We have to play 4 quarters of good offense and at least get some shutout defense if we have any hope of beating cougar high or Mickey mouse U..
For me, I'm not going to be as emotionally attach to the games since it looks like a 5-7 season based on past performance. I'll be at the home games but its just going to feel like the season is over. Thanks JJ.
Tech is smoke and mirrors, we were supposed to beat them, even Vegas put them -2.5 coming into that game. TCU's offense is inexistent. HORRIBLE! There is no excuse in letting them put 48 on us. TCU should have been a win. Sadly, this was the year to beat them, because once they start getting Big 12 talent (they are arguably one of the hottest programs in the Big 12, even while losing, Oh and they compete vs Texas in recruiting) they will have Big 12 depth and we will never beat them again.
No neither the TCU nor the tech game "should" have been a win. Those teams teams had clearly superior talent, coaching and execution. Hence why they beat us. Where on earth do you get this stuff from? Have you watched the games??? "Could" we have won the tech game? Possibly, but the reason you play 4 quarters of football is that in the end, the team that performs better will win out. Usually you perform better with superior talent and coaching.
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
-

blackoutpony

-
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
- Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests
|
|