mrydel wrote:I guess I am the only person that did not know and do everything I was supposed to know and do on my first day on a job. Burcham has all the tools. He needs experience which he has not been allowed until today. I have no problem with him going forward. I am much more concerned with recruiting players around him.
The Oline did him absolutely no favors. They had a horrible day and put him on his heels. It is hard enough not having experience but when your line looks like matadors and your revivers can't catch, you tend to look worse than you are.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Tbuck12 wrote: The kid is in a river. Rolling up your jeans when standing in a river seems logical to me. Seattle is a great city...but agreed, way too many hipsters.
See what happens when there is a 34-0 blow out. I start defending a commercial.
Ha ha. But seriously, who would wear rolled up jeans in Africa? You'd think shorts would be a better option. At least they weren't jorts (jean shorts).
Very tough game to watch!! Sad part is, I wasn't really expecting any other outcome once GG went down. He is the only reason we have been even remotely competitive this season.
And as far as this year's SMU commercial - it's awful!!! Show the beautiful campus rather than cartoon characters.
My dad once wore blorts (black jean shorts) and tall crew socks with his sneakers... I told him he looked ridiculous... Shortly afterwards many hipsters were wearing that very style.
Also, he once rocked a mustache. Basically, my Dad is a hipster trendsetter
I'll say it again that if an angel got its wings every time one of our diminutive wide receivers drops a ball that hits them squarely in the hands, than world peace would be no problem.
That, and that awful commercial cartoon still blows. Only SMU would try and market itself to potential customers by not telling or showing them a single thing about the flipping product.