PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

UNT

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: UNT

Postby ALEX LIFESON » Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:30 pm

GiddyUp wrote:they would kill us, so would Rice right now


Yep.
User avatar
ALEX LIFESON
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11387
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: GARLAND

Re: UNT

Postby smusic 00 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:38 pm

mustangbill67 wrote:They beat us the last time we played up there. That was really embarrassing.

Ugh
User avatar
smusic 00
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6912
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: Downtown

Re: UNT

Postby MG_Eagle » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:15 pm

We've had a very solid season considering the last decade has been dreadful. Things are looking up but we still have some ways to go. Look forward to the series we have starting next season. Yes we have quite a few seniors that have been huge for us this season but I go back to coaching and what McCarney has brought with him compared to Dodge and that whole awful fiasco. Having an increased budget for athletics and respectable pay for a coaching staff certainly does help as well.

As for SMU and someone that looks at your program from afar, my thought is that Jones has brought the program out of what it used to be but has not nearly achieved what you folks had thought and hoped for when he came. I bet the whole issue that happened with AZ State may have made things a bit weird between him and the administration.
MG_Eagle
Newbie
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:46 am

Re: UNT

Postby feelthehorsepower » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:16 pm

MG_Eagle wrote:We've had a very solid season considering the last decade has been dreadful. Things are looking up but we still have some ways to go. Look forward to the series we have starting next season. Yes we have quite a few seniors that have been huge for us this season but I go back to coaching and what McCarney has brought with him compared to Dodge and that whole awful fiasco. Having an increased budget for athletics and respectable pay for a coaching staff certainly does help as well.

As for SMU and someone that looks at your program from afar, my thought is that Jones has brought the program out of what it used to be but has not nearly achieved what you folks had thought and hoped for when he came. I bet the whole issue that happened with AZ State may have made things a bit weird between him and the administration.


THIS
User avatar
feelthehorsepower
Heisman
 
Posts: 1518
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:38 pm
Location: Ponytown, USA (Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex)

Re: UNT

Postby East Coast Mustang » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:19 pm

MG_Eagle wrote:I bet the whole issue that happened with AZ State may have made things a bit weird between him and the administration.

You just summed up the last two years of this forum in one sentence
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7432
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: UNT

Postby Mustangsabu » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:52 pm

East Coast Mustang wrote:
MG_Eagle wrote:I bet the whole issue that happened with AZ State may have made things a bit weird between him and the administration.

You just summed up the last two years of this forum in one sentence


Hahaha! Excellent post!
Mustangs Abu!
User avatar
Mustangsabu
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4438
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: UNT

Postby SMU2007 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:56 pm

MG_Eagle wrote:We've had a very solid season


You lost all credibility right out of the gate
User avatar
SMU2007
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5561
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am

Re: UNT

Postby MG_Eagle » Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:05 am

SMU2007 wrote:
MG_Eagle wrote:We've had a very solid season


You lost all credibility right out of the gate


Not really sure what you mean...
MG_Eagle
Newbie
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:46 am

Re: UNT

Postby Grant Carter » Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:07 am

MG_Eagle wrote:
SMU2007 wrote:
MG_Eagle wrote:We've had a very solid season


You lost all credibility right out of the gate


Not really sure what you mean...

Agreed. I am interested in his explanation.
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: UNT

Postby JasonB » Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:33 am

For those who keep arguing that we should play a competitive schedule non-conference...

You guys think UNT and Rice are good?

Rice: A&M, Kansas, FL Atl, Houston non-conference. Their wins are against Massey rankings 123, 102, 146, 83, 279, 252, 223, and 200. They played a worse schedule than we have in the last 25 years, but you guys are raving about their season.

UNT: Idaho, Ohio, Ball St, Georgia. Wins against 268, 62, 91, 223, 378, 76, 252. the win against ball state (62) is made up for by losses to 96 and 130.

The average Joe doesn't give a crap who your wins are against. They just see the bottom line.

We should be scheduling one hard non-conference game every year and three pansies. Once we can get to ten wins with a really easy schedule, then worry about improving the non-conference schedule.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: UNT

Postby MG_Eagle » Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:52 am

JasonB wrote:For those who keep arguing that we should play a competitive schedule non-conference...

You guys think UNT and Rice are good?

Rice: A&M, Kansas, FL Atl, Houston non-conference. Their wins are against Massey rankings 123, 102, 146, 83, 279, 252, 223, and 200. They played a worse schedule than we have in the last 25 years, but you guys are raving about their season.

UNT: Idaho, Ohio, Ball St, Georgia. Wins against 268, 62, 91, 223, 378, 76, 252. the win against ball state (62) is made up for by losses to 96 and 130.

The average Joe doesn't give a crap who your wins are against. They just see the bottom line.

We should be scheduling one hard non-conference game every year and three pansies. Once we can get to ten wins with a really easy schedule, then worry about improving the non-conference schedule.


I agree with only scheduling one hard non conference or body bag game per season but having the rest as good but winnable. Rice had a very respectable non conference with Aggies, and Houston. Kansas while bad are still in a BCS conference. For NT Idaho is the clear puke of the 4. Ball State and Ohio both are decent mid majors. Ohio actually fell off dramatically which makes that loss worse but they've had a nice run under Solich the past few years. Georgia speaks for itself and NT made it a game with them for almost 3 quarters. Yes that doesn't mean anything ultimately but for those that saw the game they were in the game til the 4th qtr.

In the end they're not world beaters but I don't think it's inaccurate saying both Rice and NT have had a decent year as mid majors.
MG_Eagle
Newbie
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:46 am

Re: UNT

Postby HarvCrimYaleBlue » Sun Dec 01, 2013 10:06 am

MG_Eagle wrote:
SMU2007 wrote:
MG_Eagle wrote:We've had a very solid season


You lost all credibility right out of the gate


Not really sure what you mean...


MG_Eagle I think he thought you were talking about SMU having a solid season (didn't look at your handle to see you are UNT).
User avatar
HarvCrimYaleBlue
Heisman
 
Posts: 1425
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:47 pm

Re: UNT

Postby SMU2007 » Sun Dec 01, 2013 10:26 am

oh, my mistake Eagle. Didn't even notice you were a UNT fan. Congrats on having a team with some upward momentum.
User avatar
SMU2007
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5561
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am

Re: UNT

Postby sbsmith » Sun Dec 01, 2013 10:51 am

JasonB wrote:For those who keep arguing that we should play a competitive schedule non-conference...




The average Joe doesn't give a crap who your wins are against. They just see the bottom line.




We should absolutely play a competitive OOC schedule because that's who the average Joe in Dallas cares about. The average Joe in Dallas doesn't give a crap about a bottom line that includes a bunch of fake wins over nobodies (see SMU attendance 2009-2013). Rice and NTSU have good teams this year and they'd both beat us but that doesn't mean we should emulate their scheduling strategies.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: UNT

Postby East Coast Mustang » Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:31 am

OOC is easy, we've discussed this 10,000 times.

Play two "premiere" P5 teams. TCU every year and then Tech/Baylor/Michigan/whoever

Play UNT- local rivalry, will bring fans

Play one pushover FCS school, and try to beat them by more than one point. Preferably a local FCS school like SFA or Sam Houston State that will bring fans
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7432
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests