PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

UNT

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: UNT

Postby Grant Carter » Sun Dec 01, 2013 3:10 pm

SMU2007 wrote:oh, my mistake Eagle. Didn't even notice you were a UNT fan. Congrats on having a team with some upward momentum.

Understandable. Who has time to read past the first sentence of a post when you can jump to a conclusion and criticize someone?
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: UNT

Postby MG_Eagle » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:54 pm

SMU2007 wrote:oh, my mistake Eagle. Didn't even notice you were a UNT fan. Congrats on having a team with some upward momentum.


All good and thank you. Looking forward to the head to head series with you guys starting next season.
MG_Eagle
Newbie
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:46 am

Re: UNT

Postby JasonB » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:23 pm

sbsmith wrote:
JasonB wrote:For those who keep arguing that we should play a competitive schedule non-conference...




The average Joe doesn't give a crap who your wins are against. They just see the bottom line.




We should absolutely play a competitive OOC schedule because that's who the average Joe in Dallas cares about. The average Joe in Dallas doesn't give a crap about a bottom line that includes a bunch of fake wins over nobodies (see SMU attendance 2009-2013). Rice and NTSU have good teams this year and they'd both beat us but that doesn't mean we should emulate their scheduling strategies.


Don't you see? Rice hasn't beaten any decent teams this year, and you are claiming they are "good". That is the value of playing a weak non-conference schedule.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: UNT

Postby sbsmith » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:38 pm

Rice draws flies to their football games (both in the stands and on TV) so ultimately it doesn't really matter if anyone claims they're "good" or not. That's why ultimately there's no value in weak OOC scheduling.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: UNT

Postby ReedFrawg » Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:06 am

I've said it before...tcu feasted mostly on poor to avg conference opponents and mostly weak OOC competition. The majority of our OOC wins were aginst schools like vandy, northwestern, navy, iowa state, etc. We did beat Tech once and we won at Clemson but those were not the norm.

SMU needs to win 10+ games for 3-4 yrs and then worry about ramping up the ooc schedule.
ReedFrawg
Heisman
 
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Re: UNT

Postby orguy » Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:31 am

Is not Mccarney a well documented wife beating misogynist? Think SMU could do without this type individual.

NTSU can keep that guy.
orguy
All-American
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
Location: SF bay area

Re: UNT

Postby orguy » Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:33 am

sbsmith wrote:Rice draws flies to their football games (both in the stands and on TV) so ultimately it doesn't really matter if anyone claims they're "good" or not. That's why ultimately there's no value in weak OOC scheduling.


So Rice is in the same boat as SMU?
orguy
All-American
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
Location: SF bay area

Re: UNT

Postby CA Mustang » Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:05 am

orguy wrote:Is not Mccarney a well documented wife beating misogynist? Think SMU could do without this type individual.

NTSU can keep that guy.

Correct. Granted the allegations date back to the early 90's, but that still isn't the guy you'd want to represent SMU.
CA Mustang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2694
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Elk Grove, CA

Previous

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests