I was thinking an interesting comparison could be made between the Bennett 6-6 year and any given June year.
Bennett was very close to going 7-5, and even at 6-6 if he had June's political sway in Hawaii or elsewhere we would have gone bowling. This was Bennett's one-year zenith while June has trucked along for 4 years straight, but many feel, as I do, that we haven't really improved much in those 4 years. You could say it is a 4-year zenith.
How do they compare?
Because it is quick, I picked Sagrin ratings as a means to compare.
2012 (June 6-6) vs 2006 ( Bennett 6-6)
2006 rating at end of year: 62.78
2012 rating at end of year: 72.94
That's a big difference that implies the 2012 team is far better than 2006. But ratings take in to account your opponent, and scheduling makes a big difference.
Opponent average rating:
2006: 62.499
2012: 72.94
Much harder schedule in 2012. But let's look deeper. What is driving this rating?
Highest 3 ratings on the schedule that year:
2006: Tech 78, UH 73.11, Tulsa 69.37
2012: Aggy 93.31, Baylor 82.64, TCU 78.39.
So our OOC schedule is really boosting our average opponent rating in 2012. But who we lost to doesn't say much. We need to know who we actually beat to get a fair comparison, because who we beat those two years are much more comparable than who we lost to.
Average rating of opponents we beat:
2006: 58.85
2012: 59.278
What does this mean? It appears that although the overall schedule is tougher for June, we have about the same quality of wins. To me, both teams have 6 wins vs. about the same level of competition. That means we haven't come very far?
=====================================================================
Maybe we need to build IPF to show recruits we are
COMMITTED 
LOTTA OF NEW BUILDINGS ON CAMPUS
May the forth be with us.
