DE Parker Collins

jpe747 · Post by **jpe747** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 1:41 am

Holland twittes DE Parker Collins of Frisco Liberty comments to SMU.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 2:15 am

this is the walkon commitment right

HorsePower · Post by **HorsePower** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 2:27 am

hudl lists him at 6'3" and 215. Safe to say this guy moves to LB at SMU?

Grant Carter · Post by **Grant Carter** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:24 am

Stallion wrote:this is the walkon commitment right

Believe so

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:03 am

Did any school have any interest in him?

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:05 am

Yes, it as been reported that he is a walk on.

lwjr · Post by **lwjr** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 3:29 pm

HorsePower wrote:hudl lists him at 6'3" and 215. Safe to say this guy moves to LB at SMU?

Running back

ClassOf81 · Post by **ClassOf81** » Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:43 pm

Running back? That's good size, especially if he can add some muscle as he matures. Anyone know what kind of speed he has?

Potential to be a nice walk-on. Welcome, Parker!

Me · Post by Me » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:43 am

Slow down with Parker. I have coached him for 3 years and he is a fantastic kid yet has a long way to go with playing football. That's not a shot at him because I think the world of him but there is much work for him to do if he indeed is playing football for SMU. And he is certainly not a RB. This is complete news for me that SMU is on him. The only schools I've seen in our office talking to him are Rice and Carnegie-Mellon. Haven't seen an SMU recruiter in over a year.

RGV Pony · Post by **RGV Pony** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:47 am

Me wrote:Slow down with Parker. I have coached him for 3 years and he is a fantastic kid yet has a long way to go with playing football. That's not a shot at him because I think the world of him but there is much work for him to do if he indeed is playing football for SMU. And he is certainly not a RB. This is complete news for me that SMU is on him. The only schools I've seen in our office talking to him are Rice and Carnegie-Mellon. Haven't seen an SMU recruiter in over a year.

Thanks coach. The last sentence actually lends credence to the possibility

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:52 am

Me wrote:Haven't seen an SMU recruiter in over a year.

is anyone shocked by this comment? Of course not - we don't recruit...we evaluate!!! :twisted:

lwjr · Post by **lwjr** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:14 am

ClassOf81 wrote:Running back? That's good size, especially if he can add some muscle as he matures. Anyone know what kind of speed he has?

Potential to be a nice walk-on. Welcome, Parker!

That was meant as a joke.

Fresno Mustang · Post by **Fresno Mustang** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:04 pm

Me wrote:Slow down with Parker. I have coached him for 3 years and he is a fantastic kid yet has a long way to go with playing football. That's not a shot at him because I think the world of him but there is much work for him to do if he indeed is playing football for SMU. And he is certainly not a RB. This is complete news for me that SMU is on him. The only schools I've seen in our office talking to him are Rice and Carnegie-Mellon. Haven't seen an SMU recruiter in over a year.

Out of curiosity, which school do you coach at? Do kids even know what SMU is / wonder why theyre never around or are we virutally non existent?

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:29 pm

I'd bet Frisco Liberty

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:25 pm

Me wrote:Slow down with Parker. I have coached him for 3 years and he is a fantastic kid yet has a long way to go with playing football. That's not a shot at him because I think the world of him but there is much work for him to do if he indeed is playing football for SMU. And he is certainly not a RB. This is complete news for me that SMU is on him. The only schools I've seen in our office talking to him are Rice and Carnegie-Mellon. Haven't seen an SMU recruiter in over a year.

Got anybody else we should be looking at?

DE Parker Collins

DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins

Re: DE Parker Collins