Objective evidence that Baylor will not win Saturday

[Frognosticator]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
2004: @ UAB 14 - 56

I think I see a trend here.

I will be at this game after coming back from Norman earlier in the day.

[BUPBA]

the only diffrence between those teams and SMU is those teams can actually win.

[robo98564BU]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
2004: @ UAB 14 - 56

I think I see a trend here.

I will be at this game after coming back from Norman earlier in the day.

If your gonna be "objective", give us the SMU scores too

The last 4 SMU openers:::
2001: @ La Tech- L 36-6
2002: vs. Navy- L 38-7
2003: @ T Tech- L 58-10
2004: vs. T Tech- L 27-13

way to be objective [deleted]...

[JudgeChamber]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
Seneca Wallace

2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
Kyle Boller

2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
Booger McFarland

2004: @ UAB 14 - 56
Darrell Hackney

And who does SMU have?

[Sam I Am]

Talk about a matched pair of losers, SMU and Baylor are pathetic season openers. But losing to Tech the last two years is more respectable than losing to UNT and UAB. I don't know, maybe neither team will win this time. Is there a limit to the number of scorelss overtimes two teams must play under NCAA rules these days?

[PonySnob]

Let's hope that this game as not as ugly as the game in Waco 2 years ago. Both of those teams would have been beaten by a decent 5A team.

[Col. Nathan R. Jessep]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
Seneca Wallace

2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
Kyle Boller

2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
Booger McFarland

2004: @ UAB 14 - 56
Darrell Hackney

And who does SMU have?

"And who does SMU have?"

Judge, just like Iowa St, Cal., UNT, & UAB, SMU HAS/HAVE the same opponent: Baylor!!!!!!!

[ThadFilms]

You know what, Jessep?

I don't think the Judge can handle the truth...

[Frognosticator]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
2004: @ UAB 14 - 56

I think I see a trend here.

I will be at this game after coming back from Norman earlier in the day.

If your gonna be "objective", give us the SMU scores too

The last 4 SMU openers:::
2001: @ La Tech- L 36-6
2002: vs. Navy- L 38-7
2003: @ T Tech- L 58-10
2004: vs. T Tech- L 27-13

way to be objective [deleted]...

Exactly. Your own evidence shows that SMU lost by less than 38 points in 3 out of 4 openers - something Baylor has failed to do.

[JudgeChamber]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
Seneca Wallace

2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
Kyle Boller

2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
Booger McFarland

2004: @ UAB 14 - 56
Darrell Hackney

And who does SMU have?

"And who does SMU have?"

Judge, just like Iowa St, Cal., UNT, & UAB, SMU HAS/HAVE the same opponent: Baylor!!!!!!!

Right... So nobody. Got ya!

[Caballo]

I'm with the Judge on this one, Baylor is definitely a nobody.

[Sam I Am]

Wako fans, like Mr. Anderson, it is useless to resist. Give in to the matrix, you Baylor barebackers.
--Agent Smith

[hunters]

I am pretty sure Romo is starting at qb. I think this was a good choice, as eckert telegraphs his passes.

[robo98564BU]

The last 4 Baylor road openers:

2001: @ Iowa St. 0 - 41
2002: @ Cal 22 - 70
2003: @ North Texas 14 - 52
2004: @ UAB 14 - 56

I think I see a trend here.

I will be at this game after coming back from Norman earlier in the day.

If your gonna be "objective", give us the SMU scores too

The last 4 SMU openers:::
2001: @ La Tech- L 36-6
2002: vs. Navy- L 38-7
2003: @ T Tech- L 58-10
2004: vs. T Tech- L 27-13

way to be objective [deleted]...

Exactly. Your own evidence shows that SMU lost by less than 38 points in 3 out of 4 openers - something Baylor has failed to do.

But other than Tech, you havent really played anyone. And tech spanked you in 2003. You somehow managed to hang with them last year, and I will admit that that was impressive. I watched that game and was actually somewhat pulling for SMU cause I like the underdog. But you cannot look at past years (2 of which were with an old coach, and 2 of which were with a new coach trying to clean up the old coach's loser attitute) and use past years' results as "evidence" as to why we will lose THIS year...

None of the teams that killed us in the past few years were near as bad as SMU is.

[mustang_of_smu]

the only diffrence between those teams and SMU is those teams can actually win.

UAB couldn't buy a win before that game. North Texas could only beat teams ranked in the bottom five in the NCAA (aka the rest of the Sun Belt) until their game against you.