SMU Fans Are Easily the Worst in College Football.

by **Nacho** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 5:43 pm

SMU has clearly shown for almost 2 decades that they are not committed to fielding a competitive football team. This begs the question, Why would a college football fan come to SMU? The result of this football policy is that SMU attracts students who aren't really fans of SMU. We have some college football fans but not SMU fans. It's a very strange situation. Ask yourself this. If you were a 17 year old hs senior college football fan who was trying to decide where to go to college, Where would you go? Would you go to a school that (academics being equal) did very poorly at football? SMU is getting high caliber students. The current average SAT is 1200 for the incoming class. This is great. I am glad to see it. We are now well on our way to becoming the Emory of the southwest. As soon as we finish our mission and completely destroy the football team then we can rightfully carry that banner with pride.

by **MrMustang1965** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:11 pm

Thank God I've got another football team to follow besides SMU. :shock:

by **jtstang** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:19 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:And you know what the major difference is between my alma mater (a 'lowly Div. 1-AA team') and SMU's football teams? WE WIN A HELLUVA LOT MORE OFTEN!

Well then screw you, I guess we know your true loyalties. And screw you again for bashing the hotties on the 'vard, which, coincidentally, were the ONLY things worth watching on Saturday. Your twins don't deserve to go here if they don't like it.

by **MrMustang1965** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:27 pm

jtstang wrote:
MrMustang1965 wrote:And you know what the major difference is between my alma mater (a 'lowly Div. 1-AA team') and SMU's football teams? WE WIN A HELLUVA LOT MORE OFTEN!

Well then screw you, I guess we know your true loyalties. And screw you again for bashing the hotties on the 'vard, which, coincidentally, were the ONLY things worth watching on Saturday. Your twins don't deserve to go here if they don't like it.

Good god, jt. You can dish it out but, as Colonel Nathan Jessup says on this board, "You can't handle the truth!" Congratulations. You, Stallion, ponysnob and a few others on this board have succeeded...I'm bitter as hell about SMU football now...just like the rest of you. No more 'sunshine' from me. And bashing my twin stepdaughters...? :roll:

C'mon, jt. I'm about to bust a gut laughing.

by **jtstang** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:29 pm

You never went here, and you got no stake, and your posting has shown your true colors, D-2 boy. Laugh your way back to Sam Houston for all we care.

by **MrMustang1965** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:35 pm

jtstang wrote:You never went here, and you got no stake, and your posting has shown your true colors, D-2 boy. Laugh your way back to Sam Houston for all we care.

My, my, my...did I upset you, jt? Why so suddenly defensive of a football program that hasn't had a winning season in God knows how long? Make up your mind, boy. One minute you're bashing this program and now you're defending it? Get a grip on reality. As you and several others on this board have said so often, SMU's football program is headed for Div. 1-AA (or lower or maybe into extinction). Congratulations. You've convinced me and so has the play on the field.

by **Stallion** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:21 pm

he ain't mad because you are bashing the football team-JTStang doesn't worry about things like that--he is mad because you bashed the fabulous display of Hot Chicks on the Boulevard which simply makes you an IDIOT. Sorry but you deserve that title after coming on an SMU board and calling SMU chicks Hookers. As we say in the Courtroom the persuasiveness of your opinions has been impeached by the stupidity of your own words.

by **PonySnob** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:02 pm

If it weren't for the boulevard, would anybody even come to the SMU games?

by **RE Tycoon** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:17 pm

No they wouldn't. The girls on the Blvd. make the crap on the field watchable. Even the 'Vard can't keep that up much longer.

by **MrMustang1965** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:31 pm

Stallion wrote:he ain't mad because you are bashing the football team-JTStang doesn't worry about things like that--he is mad because you bashed the fabulous display of Hot Chicks on the Boulevard which simply makes you an IDIOT. Sorry but you deserve that title after coming on an SMU board and calling SMU chicks Hookers. As we say in the Courtroom the persuasiveness of your opinions has been impeached by the stupidity of your own words.

Stallion: get the facts straight. I called 'em sluts & SMUt's, not Hookers. And jt says 'screw you' twice...once in reference to my statement about Sam Houston winning more games than SMU and secondly about the SMU coeds. And I can't believe that all of ya'll are so bent out of shape over what I think about how SMU's coeds dress on The Blvd. It's laughable. As many of you have said so many times, what does my opinion matter? I didn't go to SMU so my opinion is not worth a sh*t. Are ya'll actually wasting your time DEFENDING SMU's coeds instead of discussing the football team? Is this the state of things on The Hilltop? Let's just rename this fan site: www.smuhotchicks.com.

by **SWC2010** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:45 pm

Hey, MrMustang1965 is just stating an opinion on the way a few young coeds looked (on the Blvd).

As the father of a teenage girl, with a little knowledge of the new fashions, I would say a few of 'em looked like they belonged at the "Colonial"!

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing...

by **KnuckleStang** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:09 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:Let's just rename this fan site: www.smuhotchicks.com.

If such a site existed, I'd bookmark it. Well, maybe not. Mrs. KStang uses the same computer...

Don't you understand, MM? Hot chicks is all we HAVE at this point. To many folks on this board, bashing them is almost like bashing the running pony! Truth be told, this thread only makes me more eager to fly down for a game. SMUts on the BLVD? I'm having trouble seeing the downside.

by **MrMustang1965** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:38 pm

KnuckleStang wrote:
MrMustang1965 wrote:Let's just rename this fan site: www.smuhotchicks.com.

If such a site existed, I'd bookmark it. Well, maybe not. Mrs. KStang uses the same computer...

Don't you understand, MM? Hot chicks is all we HAVE at this point. To many folks on this board, bashing them is almost like bashing the running pony! Truth be told, this thread only makes me more eager to fly down for a game. SMUts on the BLVD? I'm having trouble seeing the downside.

Another season ticket holder is mailing me his tickets this week...he's through with SMU football. If you're crazy enough to fly in from NYC, I'll give you one.

by **BarbaraAnn** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:08 am

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAA!

What the hell, guys? Fighting about SMU girls? Apparently SMU frat guys never change. I might personally agree with MrMustang, but seriously, there are better things to fight about.

I can't believe this crap. "Hot chicks is all we HAVE at this point" and all the bickering about who came from where. MrMustang has shown MORE school pride than 90-95% of the SMU alums. Whatever this is just ridiculous.

The band doesn't condone your stupidity.

Move this thread to the "general discussion" forum and get it the hell out of here.

by **KnuckleStang** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:10 am

MrMustang1965 wrote:Another season ticket holder is mailing me his tickets this week...he's through with SMU football. If you're crazy enough to fly in from NYC, I'll give you one.

Thanks for calling my bluff, MM. :wink:

We've got too many weddings to hit this season, and doll-baby won't stand for it this year.

SMU Fans Are Easily the Worst in College Football.

Who is online