SMUtrojanFAN wrote:FroggieFever wrote:I read all 76 posts and not one post criticized the campus...
Slow day over there in F-Dubs, eh?
TCUseless campus?
Let's see.....
SMU = Georgian
TCUseless in Fort Worthless = Southwestern YUCK!
Nuff said
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
lwjr wrote:FroggieFever wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Has anyone been to the Rose Bowl? That place is a god-awful as well.
as is Cal
FrogFever,
While the renovation takes place, what discussion has there been about where the team will play their home games?
HFvictory wrote:lwjr wrote:FroggieFever wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Has anyone been to the Rose Bowl? That place is a god-awful as well.
as is Cal
FrogFever,
While the renovation takes place, what discussion has there been about where the team will play their home games?
Heard it was to be done in phases. the east side 1st and then the west side, so basically done over a 2 year period.
I actually had hoped they would preserve as much as possible of the old stadium, but in the end they thought it would be cheaper to raze the old and construct a new one. Really not enough info on the final design out yet, or even known if the designs are even finalized. The rendition on the media guide is not the most appealing design and easily to see many flaws in concept.
Will be interesting to see the final plans and a final schedule of construction.
RednBlue11 wrote:HFvictory wrote:lwjr wrote:FroggieFever wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Has anyone been to the Rose Bowl? That place is a god-awful as well.
as is Cal
FrogFever,
While the renovation takes place, what discussion has there been about where the team will play their home games?
Heard it was to be done in phases. the east side 1st and then the west side, so basically done over a 2 year period.
I actually had hoped they would preserve as much as possible of the old stadium, but in the end they thought it would be cheaper to raze the old and construct a new one. Really not enough info on the final design out yet, or even known if the designs are even finalized. The rendition on the media guide is not the most appealing design and easily to see many flaws in concept.
Will be interesting to see the final plans and a final schedule of construction.
if its gonna take 2 years to do that tiny place i could understand why they might need 175 million.
CalallenStang wrote:RednBlue11 wrote:HFvictory wrote:lwjr wrote:FroggieFever wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Has anyone been to the Rose Bowl? That place is a god-awful as well.
as is Cal
FrogFever,
While the renovation takes place, what discussion has there been about where the team will play their home games?
Heard it was to be done in phases. the east side 1st and then the west side, so basically done over a 2 year period.
I actually had hoped they would preserve as much as possible of the old stadium, but in the end they thought it would be cheaper to raze the old and construct a new one. Really not enough info on the final design out yet, or even known if the designs are even finalized. The rendition on the media guide is not the most appealing design and easily to see many flaws in concept.
Will be interesting to see the final plans and a final schedule of construction.
if its gonna take 2 years to do that tiny place i could understand why they might need 175 million.
They have to budget time and money for any potential collapses.
RednBlue11 wrote:CalallenStang wrote:RednBlue11 wrote:HFvictory wrote:lwjr wrote:FroggieFever wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Has anyone been to the Rose Bowl? That place is a god-awful as well.
as is Cal
FrogFever,
While the renovation takes place, what discussion has there been about where the team will play their home games?
Heard it was to be done in phases. the east side 1st and then the west side, so basically done over a 2 year period.
I actually had hoped they would preserve as much as possible of the old stadium, but in the end they thought it would be cheaper to raze the old and construct a new one. Really not enough info on the final design out yet, or even known if the designs are even finalized. The rendition on the media guide is not the most appealing design and easily to see many flaws in concept.
Will be interesting to see the final plans and a final schedule of construction.
if its gonna take 2 years to do that tiny place i could understand why they might need 175 million.
They have to budget time and money for any potential collapses.
does anyone want to go plant something in the new foundation while its drying?
CalallenStang wrote:RednBlue11 wrote:CalallenStang wrote:RednBlue11 wrote:HFvictory wrote:lwjr wrote:FroggieFever wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Has anyone been to the Rose Bowl? That place is a god-awful as well.
as is Cal
FrogFever,
While the renovation takes place, what discussion has there been about where the team will play their home games?
Heard it was to be done in phases. the east side 1st and then the west side, so basically done over a 2 year period.
I actually had hoped they would preserve as much as possible of the old stadium, but in the end they thought it would be cheaper to raze the old and construct a new one. Really not enough info on the final design out yet, or even known if the designs are even finalized. The rendition on the media guide is not the most appealing design and easily to see many flaws in concept.
Will be interesting to see the final plans and a final schedule of construction.
if its gonna take 2 years to do that tiny place i could understand why they might need 175 million.
They have to budget time and money for any potential collapses.
does anyone want to go plant something in the new foundation while its drying?
Like what? Rye grass seed?
QuikSStang wrote:Corp wrote:sam1122 wrote:
I think SMU should consider putting in real seats as
opposed to high school aluminum bleachers before
it can call another stadium an eye sore.
Clarification
I would assume that the description above is incorrect.
I've only seen pictures of the exterior of Ford Stadium.
As I recall the exterior is covered entirely with brick.
Therefore it would seem highly unlikely that the entire
inner structure of such a stadium would be composed
of aluminum bleachers.
hes actually right. its almost all bleachers. but it still blows me away that the entire project of Ford Stadium cost $42M (wikipedia) and the frogs wanna renovate their turd for 175+...
Corp wrote:QuikSStang wrote:Corp wrote:sam1122 wrote:
I think SMU should consider putting in real seats as
opposed to high school aluminum bleachers before
it can call another stadium an eye sore.
Clarification
I would assume that the description above is incorrect.
I've only seen pictures of the exterior of Ford Stadium.
As I recall the exterior is covered entirely with brick.
Therefore it would seem highly unlikely that the entire
inner structure of such a stadium would be composed
of aluminum bleachers.
hes actually right. its almost all bleachers. but it still blows me away that the entire project of Ford Stadium cost $42M (wikipedia) and the frogs wanna renovate their turd for 175+...
So, you are saying that SMU's Ford stadium is actually composed
entirely of "Friday Night Lights" aluminum bleachers that have been
cleverly hidden by an exterior facade of brick. No wonder the overall
cost was so incredibly CHEAP. It's somewhat tantamount to putting
lipstick on a pig. Those who play in a stadium with aluminum bleachers
have no room to throw stones.
Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote: