Wichita St seems likely to join AAC

[CoxMustangFan]

Should make for a more interesting next season.

[DanFreibergerForHeisman]

Very happy to hear the scheduling news. Divisions would have been terrible.

[sadderbudweiser]

Good news on both the vote and the scheduling. Onward and upward!

[PonySnob]

What does it do to the conference TV money?

[Bergermeister]

Now there are two teams in the conference who can give them the shocker.

[Rebel10]

Glad to add a team that will play angry.. A road trip to wa WSU will be fun.

[Grant Carter]

Agree on Tulane, ECU and USF for sure - less is more...

Someone good has to play the bottom teams twice. It can easily be done where each of the top 6 teams (however chosen/projected) plays each of the other top 6 teams twice, but then they will also have to play 2 against two of the bottom six teams.

I think a good way would be for teams projected 1-2 to play teams 7-8 twice, teams 3-4 to play teams 9-10 twice and teams 5-6 to play 11-12 twice.

Another way could be to have 2 of the top 6 play teams 7/12 twice, 2 of the top 6 play 8/11 twice and 2 of the top 6 play 9/10 twice.

[DanFreibergerForHeisman]

They could use the coaches preseason vote to set the matchups

[skyscraper]

I don't want anything ever determined by the coaches poll. #TheWorst

[Grant Carter]

They could use the coaches preseason vote to set the matchups

I suspect they will have already announced the schedule before the coaches preseason poll, but certainly they can come up with a number of ways to rank the teams to then come up with the schedule.

[DanFreibergerForHeisman]

I was kidding about the coaches poll, but yeah they should have a good idea of the expected pecking order in the summer when they make the schedule.

[LA_Mustang]

They can use LA Mustang's preseason rankings:

1. Wichita St
2. SMU
3. Cincinnati
4. UCF
5. Houston
6. Temple
7. UConn
8. Memphis
9. Tulsa
10. ECU
11. Tulane
12. USF

[Grant Carter]

If they use your rankings then according to my suggested approach our four singles would be Tulsa, ecu, Tulane and usf.

[Pony ^]

If they use your rankings then according to my suggested approach our four singles would be Tulsa, ecu, Tulane and usf.

I wish instead of four single games, we could just avoid playing USF and Tulane in general

[Grant Carter]

If they use your rankings then according to my suggested approach our four singles would be Tulsa, ecu, Tulane and usf.

I wish instead of four single games, we could just avoid playing USF and Tulane in general

The only way that happens is they or we join a new conference.