To continue that thought why not set up twice a year "rivalry" games for each team: SMU-UH. Tulsa-Wichita, Memphis-Tulane and Cincy-UConn, Temple-ECU, UCF-USF, no matter the rankings. Then go from there.
AusTxPony wrote:To continue that thought why not set up twice a year "rivalry" games for each team: SMU-UH. Tulsa-Wichita, Memphis-Cincinnati and Temple-UConn, Tulane-ECU, UCF-USF, no matter the rankings. Then go from there.
AusTxPony wrote:To continue that thought why not set up twice a year "rivalry" games for each team: SMU-UH. Tulsa-Wichita, Memphis-Cincinnati and Temple-UConn, Tulane-ECU, UCF-USF, no matter the rankings. Then go from there.
FIFY
I haven't looked up the all-time record, but Tulane views Memphis as their historical "rival" in basketball. I doubt the feelings are returned, but that's how they view it.
AusTxPony wrote:To continue that thought why not set up twice a year "rivalry" games for each team: SMU-UH. Tulsa-Wichita, Memphis-Cincinnati and Temple-UConn, Tulane-ECU, UCF-USF, no matter the rankings. Then go from there.
FIFY
I haven't looked up the all-time record, but Tulane views Memphis as their historical "rival" in basketball. I doubt the feelings are returned, but that's how they view it.
Nobody associated with Memphis sees Tulane as a "rival".
Yeah,,, but Tulane seemingly getting better and Memphis falling. Anyway that's why "rivalry" is in quotes. Hope all our so-called Historical Teams get better quickly, listening UConn, Temple, Memphis? And ECU, USF...OMG.