Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:45 pm
Harvard's crimson IS almost maroon. Technically, it's the same shade as Alabama's crimson, but it looks a little different on Harvard for some reason. As much as Harvard and Yale's colors are something to aspire to in spirit, in reality I don't think the combination of a dark blue and a true crimson would be pleasing to the eye.
It sounds to me like we're going back to the royal blue and bright red of the 1980s. I say "sounds" because what "looks" like one color on a computer screen looks like another shade in reality. Colors especially differ from computer screen to computer screen.
I'm sort of on-the-fence on this. While my era at SMU was the royal blue-and-red 80s, it's kind of cool sometimes to see the darker navy that the blue was intended to be. It has more off an old-school, traditional look than royal blue. A darker red would be OK, but I abhor anything close to maroon. I like that Sweet isn't taking a hard line on this.
I bet we still have a lot of dark blue (navy) products because that's simply an attractive base color - it's what people wear in polos, T-shirts, ballcaps - and it's close enough to what are now the official colors. In fact, I don't see any problem with SMU marketing a line of products in "classic" colors (i.e. navy and crimson) in addition to items in the official colors. Some schools have two mascots, two nicknames, etc. Why can't SMU have two shades of official colors?
The color samples posted here and on the AD blog don't look right on my computer screen - the red has sort of a pinkish tone and the blue looks a little too pastel. I found examples of pms 186 and pms 286, from another university's site, that I'm guessing will more closely match what you'll be seeing on SMU's uniforms:
http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwidg/color.html
It sounds to me like we're going back to the royal blue and bright red of the 1980s. I say "sounds" because what "looks" like one color on a computer screen looks like another shade in reality. Colors especially differ from computer screen to computer screen.
I'm sort of on-the-fence on this. While my era at SMU was the royal blue-and-red 80s, it's kind of cool sometimes to see the darker navy that the blue was intended to be. It has more off an old-school, traditional look than royal blue. A darker red would be OK, but I abhor anything close to maroon. I like that Sweet isn't taking a hard line on this.
I bet we still have a lot of dark blue (navy) products because that's simply an attractive base color - it's what people wear in polos, T-shirts, ballcaps - and it's close enough to what are now the official colors. In fact, I don't see any problem with SMU marketing a line of products in "classic" colors (i.e. navy and crimson) in addition to items in the official colors. Some schools have two mascots, two nicknames, etc. Why can't SMU have two shades of official colors?
The color samples posted here and on the AD blog don't look right on my computer screen - the red has sort of a pinkish tone and the blue looks a little too pastel. I found examples of pms 186 and pms 286, from another university's site, that I'm guessing will more closely match what you'll be seeing on SMU's uniforms:
http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwidg/color.html