PonyFans.com

StallionsModelT wrote:Basically said that SMU may have left a better conference in CUSA for what will be leftover in the BE after Rutgers, UConn, and probably UL and Cincy leave.

Yes, grasshoppers. We'd have been better off to stay and win CUSA a few times.
This scribe was ridiculed, you'll recall, for suggesting that mere days ago.
Big Least, my #ss.

Samurai Stang wrote:

EastStang wrote: Start seeing lots of empty seats at a Minnesota/Maryland game or a Purdue/Rutgers game and the griping will start.

Conference realignment is not about attendance. It is about television and has been for twenty years.

Yeah, that's why everyone's been begging us to join their conference!

mr. pony wrote:

StallionsModelT wrote:Basically said that SMU may have left a better conference in CUSA for what will be leftover in the BE after Rutgers, UConn, and probably UL and Cincy leave.

Yes, grasshoppers. We'd have been better off to stay and win CUSA a few times.
This scribe was ridiculed, you'll recall, for suggesting that mere days ago.
Big Least, my #ss.

You might want to wait until we see what the money payout difference between CUSA and the BE for saying anything one way or another. And that would be after the TV contract is done.

mr. pony wrote:

StallionsModelT wrote:Basically said that SMU may have left a better conference in CUSA for what will be leftover in the BE after Rutgers, UConn, and probably UL and Cincy leave.

Yes, grasshoppers. We'd have been better off to stay and win CUSA a few times.
This scribe was ridiculed, you'll recall, for suggesting that mere days ago.
Big Least, my #ss.

You are ridiculed cause you are an @ss and for pulling for SMU to lose. You are of no more value than Cougar King.