NickSMU17 wrote:FrogBait wrote:Schools other than ones like Harvard and Yale are not known for anything other than athletics. SMU is not a Harvard or a Yale. Therefore (comma), SMU is not know for anything.
I just looked it up online.....SMU is in Texas.
The name FrogBait is kind of counter intuitive...
If you are a TCU fan, why would you want frogs to be used as bait?
Are you admitting your silly little purple mascot should be used to feed bigger animals? This would make sense as a TCU Horned frog would be swallowed up and shti out if they were in a real conference...
Either way, your campus and your name are both terrible...
Why on a football forum during the week of the SMU-TCU football game, is your only punchline about academics? We're not having a nationally televised debate about economics. I think the owners of this board need to add a board about academics since that's all you Ponies seem to be able to hang your hats on.
Here's a lesson about debate. Your debate has to use facts not just opinions about whose campus is prettier to you. Our TCU fans have rattled off FACTS, as to why TCU is better than SMU and you just stick to your "our campus is better" (ignoring our new student union, admissions bulding, liberal arts building, dorms, endzone project, soccer training facility, next year's renovated stadium) and your "we were better in a newspaper article!".
Please show me facts other than a subjective newspaper article as to what SMU has achieved recently that is better than TCU.
I can go down the list on the campus side and athletic side (which this forum is about) as to reasons we dominate. Can you?