2005 Football recruits

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
No Quarter
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 4:01 am

2005 Football recruits

Post by No Quarter »

How many 'ships available at this time?

How many committments that would likely be honored?

How many offers have been made and to whom?

Are there 2004 walk-ons who will get a scholarships?

How would YOU divide the 'ships by position?

Looks to me like a QB is a must and (I'm with BUS!) SMU needs linemen on both sides of the ball. Also, really need more balance than last year.
User avatar
BUS
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7315
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Richardson, Tx usa

Post by BUS »

Best number I have is 22.
22 would be honored - I don't think we play the indian giver game.
7 I think. One QB, One LB, 5 linemen. - I am not the detail guy with a list of names. I do know that Enright from SLcarol is one of them. Someone wil post a complete list.
There are a few, like two that I hear will be rewarded for making the team.
Open for 20 new people given two for 2004 walk-ons.

1-QB
2-LB's
1-WR
2-BD's
2 - OPEN

4 Linemen form JUCO ranks - two O and two D
8 Linemen from recruiting
Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
ALL4SMU
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Post by ALL4SMU »

CURRENT COMMITS

Todd Alexander LB 5.3 6-1/193 NR Fort Worth, TX
David Allison OL 5.4 6-6/287 NR Humble, TX
Jeff Brock ATH 5.3 6-4/240 NR Spearman, TX
Mitch Enright OL 5.3 6-1/282 NR Southlake, TX
Josh Hickman OL 5.2 6-2/277 NR Rowlett, TX
Eric Johnson QB 5.3 6-1/198 NR Plano, TX
Brad Lankford DT 5.1 6-3/270 NR Waco, TX
\"Show me a happy and gracious loser, and I'll show you a failure.\"- Knute Rockne
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Post by PK »

It's nice to see those "big uglies" on that list. My understanding is that they are still after a few more of them. If things fall in place, this could be a really good class...I think the contract extension was done to help with the recruiting. It lets players know that the coach recruiting them is going to be around for their whole time there. Some may not care, but there will be instances where that is important to the recruit.
User avatar
Boston Pony
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Now in SF Bay Area

Stark contrast

Post by Boston Pony »

Another result of the contract extension is that it stands at a stark contrast to the rest of college football. Coaches at ND, Stanford, Florida, BYU, East Carolina, Indiana, & Washington all were gone in less than 5 years (the traditional 'honeymoon'). While I have never liked ND, Stanford has shown just as much hypocrisy with the firing of Buddy Tevens. While I have not decided if I support the extension (they didn't ask me for some reason), I am proud we haven't fallen into trap of getting rid of coaches before their time.
Post Reply