Which loss was worse???

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:27 pm

Worst loss:

FW · Post by FW » Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:44 pm

You guys could give us some credit. Almost every publication had Tulane contending for the C-USA West title and winning 7-9 games. We're a good team that returned 10 starters on defense and 7-8 on offense from a 5-6 team.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:54 pm

I did-thought you would contend for CUSA West. Nobody noticed you held an SEC team to 10 First Downs.

BRStang · Post by **BRStang** » Sat Sep 24, 2005 5:49 pm

Stallion wrote:

I did-thought you would contend for CUSA West. Nobody noticed you held an SEC team to 10 First Downs.

Sorry, Stallion, I don't mean to be contrarian today, but...Mississippi State is really not very good. They've lost 16 straight against other SEC West teams and lost 28-0 against a weak(er than last year) Auburn team.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Sep 24, 2005 5:51 pm

Tulane ended the season strong last year until Richard got hurt-they returned about 20 starters beat TCU at Amon Carter with a bowl game on the line, and replaced several difficult games with creampuff CUSA West-why wasn't this team given more respect. They played Championship defense two weeks in a row.

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:48 pm

FW · Post by FW » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:54 am

If it makes you feel any better (I know it won't) we do have the #1 total defense in the nation.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:05 pm

Hey FW do you remember an SMU fan coming on your fan forum the day that you hired Eric Schumann and telling the Tulane fans that they just hired one of the best in the business. BTW I don't know if you remember this but Tulane was statistically one of the worst defenses in the country the year before Schumann took over-FW maybe you could help me with this but I believe they were giving up more than 40 points per game. From what I've seen the last two weeks they have made a miraculous transformation since Tulane hired Schumann-we want him back.

FW · Post by FW » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:18 pm

In 2001 Tulane gave up around 41 points per game and gave up 70 points to BYU, 51 to ECU, 48 to LSU and 59 to Southern Miss. We couldn't stop anyone.

In 2002 Tulane gave up 20 points per game, led the nation in takeaways.

PK · Post by PK » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:49 pm

No doubt...Eric Schumann is one hell of a good defensive coach. He would probably still be here if we had not hired a DC to be our head coach...something about a difference of philosophy on defensive schemes.

GoRedGoBlue · Post by **GoRedGoBlue** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:20 pm

Stallion wrote:Hey FW do you remember an SMU fan coming on your fan forum the day that you hired Eric Schumann and telling the Tulane fans that they just hired one of the best in the business. BTW I don't know if you remember this but Tulane was statistically one of the worst defenses in the country the year before Schumann took over-FW maybe you could help me with this but I believe they were giving up more than 40 points per game. From what I've seen the last two weeks they have made a miraculous transformation since Tulane hired Schumann-we want him back.

It was truly unfortunate that Bennett's egomania prevented him from being 'just' the HEAD coach and retaining Schumann as the D-Coordinator. Perhaps our offensive ills would have been furthered as well if he had a hands off approach to Larry Kueck as well (who has a history of high octane offenses).

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:59 pm

GoRedGoBlue wrote:Perhaps our offensive ills would have been furthered as well if he had a hands off approach to Larry Kueck as well (who has a history of high octane offenses).

So far, something is clearly keeping Rusty's offense from being "high octane" as well.

Which loss was worse???

Which loss was worse this year?

Which loss was worse???