I suppose a "strong commitment" from the university means the willingness to outpay any other university. Bet Arkansas is prepared for that bid war, though.
Sir, shooting-star, sir. Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
Broyles once again is messing this up. He should have his replacement in place before shopping for coaches. But he just can't help controlling the situation a little longer.
am I the only one that thinks Broyles is the only one who doesn't realize that Arkansas is NOT UNC, Duke, Kansas or Kentucky in bball nor is it Georgia, LSU, Oklahoma or Notre Dame in football?
RGV Pony wrote:am I the only one that thinks Broyles is the only one who doesn't realize that Arkansas is NOT UNC, Duke, Kansas or Kentucky in bball nor is it Georgia, LSU, Oklahoma or Notre Dame in football?
Arkansas has one of the top 10 all time BB programs. There is a decent drop after the first 5 or 6 but Arkansas historically ranks higher than any SEC team other than Kentucky. Florida, of course is in the process of establishing itself fairly well.
Arkansas is 28th or 29th in all-time wins, hardly the 8th best program in America
“When I first committed to SMU, I thought it would take a couple of years of building. But with these players coming in, we should make a run. We have a lot of heavy hitters. It could get real ugly for a lot of teams we play.”- Jalen Jones
No way is Ark top ten in all-time basketball. They had that big year with Richardson and Williamson and that is about it. They compare with the essentailly one-hit-wonder UNLV teams under Tark. The Elvin Hayes era followed by the Hakeem years in Houston compare favorably to Ark. In no particualr order, consider the history of these programs over the years:
Duke
NC
UCLA
Kentucky
Indiana
Va
Wake
Georgetown
UNLV
Louisville
Houston
Kansas
Ohio State
Memphis
Florida
I'm sure I left out some deserving teams but above are listed 14 teams with clearly better bball history than Ark.
Ark is likely on a par with UT. No better, no worse. But neither is top ten.