Mid-major super conference
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
Mid-major super conference
Doesn't make sense that the best of the mid-majors form a super conference and then demand BCS status? It seems that such a conference would need to be 16 schools instead of 12 schools. My ideal mid-major conference is:
East
SMU
TCU
Houston
So Miss
Central Florida
Memphis
East Carolina
Marshall (or Tulsa)
West
BYU
Utah
UTEP
New Mexico
UNLV
Wy.
Boise State
Hawaii (or Fresno State)
Colo. State
East
SMU
TCU
Houston
So Miss
Central Florida
Memphis
East Carolina
Marshall (or Tulsa)
West
BYU
Utah
UTEP
New Mexico
UNLV
Wy.
Boise State
Hawaii (or Fresno State)
Colo. State
AustinTX
- perunapower
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- CalallenStang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
Re: Mid-major super conference
davish75 wrote:Doesn't make sense that the best of the mid-majors form a super conference and then demand BCS status? It seems that such a conference would need to be 16 schools instead of 12 schools. My ideal mid-major conference is:
East
SMU
TCU
Houston
So Miss
Central Florida
Memphis
East Carolina
Marshall (or Tulsa)
West
BYU
Utah
UTEP
New Mexico
UNLV
Wy.
Boise State
Hawaii (or Fresno State)
Colo. State
I think they tried that before...they called it the WAC (16)
not until the worst of the worst of the worst became the now WAC did they become the BEST non-BCS conference...
Why not have the WAC and MWC play a playoff and get a BCS slot, and the MAC and CUSA champs play into a BCS spot.
- MustangStealth
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
Re: Mid-major super conference
PhirePhilBennett wrote:I think they tried that before...they called it the WAC (16)
Correct, and it didn't work. Rivalries are watered down, the conference is too spread out to focus on things like regional TV deals and regional bowl games, etc.
- SMU Football Blog
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
- Contact:
- CalallenStang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
SMU Football Blog wrote:Not one MAC team?
No. Illinois is 49-25 over last six seasons with 3 bowls and no losing seasons.
Miami (Ohio) has two losing seasons since 1990.
I like Miami more than No. Illinois. That would be a beautful road trip to take for a game in late September and October. They have one of the most beautiful campuses in the nation. Plus, they have more of a football legacy. A quick sampling of their former football coaches or assistants: Blaik, Paul Brown, Hayes, Schembechler, Parseghian, Tressel, Dietzel, and current New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton.
Re: Mid-major super conference
PhirePhilBennett wrote:davish75 wrote:Doesn't make sense that the best of the mid-majors form a super conference and then demand BCS status? It seems that such a conference would need to be 16 schools instead of 12 schools. My ideal mid-major conference is:
East
SMU
TCU
Houston
So Miss
Central Florida
Memphis
East Carolina
Marshall (or Tulsa)
West
BYU
Utah
UTEP
New Mexico
UNLV
Wy.
Boise State
Hawaii (or Fresno State)
Colo. State
I think they tried that before...they called it the WAC (16)
not until the worst of the worst of the worst became the now WAC did they become the BEST non-BCS conference...
Why not have the WAC and MWC play a playoff and get a BCS slot, and the MAC and CUSA champs play into a BCS spot.
I really like this playoff idea. Now I'm not fan of the current BCS BS system, but this looks like a plausable idea that fits the current mold that the BCS catrel agrees to.
BCS would like it: 1 or 2 extra BCS bowl games ($$$).
Fans would like it: extra quality games in January, give a shot to mid majors.
Everyone would like it: Beginnings of a playoff system that everyone could like, or at least tolerate.
---------------
"If you don't invest very much, then defeat doesn't hurt very much and winning isn't very exciting." -- [deleted] Vermeil
"If you don't invest very much, then defeat doesn't hurt very much and winning isn't very exciting." -- [deleted] Vermeil
-
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:39 pm
mr. pony wrote:Dump Central Fla and Marshall for Vandy and Miss. State, too. Then you got something.
That's right, raid the SEC.
that is possibly the dumbest thing I have read. Why would Vandy and Miss St. leave the SEC for some Mid-Major super conf.? The SEC also wouldn't allow it either b/c they'd loose their conf. championship game.
Re: Mid-major super conference
davish75 wrote:Doesn't make sense that the best of the mid-majors form a super conference and then demand BCS status? It seems that such a conference would need to be 16 schools instead of 12 schools. My ideal mid-major conference is:
East
SMU
TCU
Houston
So Miss
Central Florida
Memphis
East Carolina
Marshall (or Tulsa)
West
BYU
Utah
UTEP
New Mexico
UNLV
Wy.
Boise State
Hawaii (or Fresno State)
Colo. State
Now that is fuuuuunny. SMU football and the word "best" mentioned in the same post ...
- Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2914
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
CalallenStang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:Not one MAC team?
No. Illinois is 49-25 over last six seasons with 3 bowls and no losing seasons.
Miami (Ohio) has two losing seasons since 1990.
I like Miami more than No. Illinois. That would be a beautful road trip to take for a game in late September and October. They have one of the most beautiful campuses in the nation. Plus, they have more of a football legacy. A quick sampling of their former football coaches or assistants: Blaik, Paul Brown, Hayes, Schembechler, Parseghian, Tressel, Dietzel, and current New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton.
I don't know about you but I'd prefer to make a stop in Chicago on the way to Dekalb.