PTI + Coker + SMU = National Recognition

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:27 pm

In the Big Finish on PTI tonight, Dan Leboutard was asked by Michael Wilbon about Coker interviewing at SMU. He responded "How many ex-national champion head coaches are out there interviewing for the SMU job? None"

MrMustang1965 · Post by **MrMustang1965** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:34 pm

Name the last time SMU got national publicity on par with this? My guess would be when the Mustangs defeated the Froggies the week after the OU game in Norman.

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:35 pm

and just think what it will be like when we actually hire one of these guys. they don't give it too much credence now, but i can see the exposure increasing with a flashy hire.

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:35 pm

probably when we fired PB and there was a link on the ESPN frontpage for an hour

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:43 pm

QuikSStang wrote:probably when we fired PB and there was a link on the ESPN frontpage for an hour

i don't know, a link on the website or actual airtime. this is bigger, and with better reason.

The XtC · Post by **The XtC** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:46 pm

Didnt we get about 4 hours of airtime when we lost to Tech?

jtstang · Post by **jtstang** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:58 pm

Yeah and that was about 3 hours and 55 minutes too much.

mrydel · Post by **mrydel** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:02 pm

Actually we got about 36 hours of that type of TV coverage.

Texas Red · Post by **Texas Red** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:03 pm

QuikSStang wrote:In the Big Finish on PTI tonight, Dan Leboutard was asked by Michael Wilbon about Coker interviewing at SMU. He responded "How many ex-national champion head coaches are out there interviewing for the SMU job? None"

So, that should tell you something about Coker. Why is a national champ interested in coaching here. Beware.

SMHoo · Post by **SMHoo** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:20 pm

So, that should tell you something about Coker. Why is a national champ interested in coaching here. Beware.[/quote]

Brilliant logic.

Shouldn't we then wonder why any coach would be interested in this job? Wouldn't any coach looking here be someone we should be wary of? And then, based on all these people who must be flawed because they are interested, we should probably pick the best of the flawed, right? So, if he's the only one w/a national championship, maybe that is a good thing. Ahh, there it is. Unless, that is, since any coach willing to come here is suspect, we should just stay coachless? That's why Steve-O's the genius! He figured it out weeks ago.

Texas Red · Post by **Texas Red** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:27 pm

Can Coker!

Dwan · Post by **Dwan** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:28 pm

Larry Coker won a national title 6 years ago and the only school that has interviewed him since he was fired (aside from us) is Rice. That should tell you everything you need to know about Coker. If not, read is season by season bio below. We need a guy like Mason or Barnett who have built something from nothing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Coker

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:31 pm

wikipedia means nothing to me

Dwan · Post by **Dwan** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:32 pm

well, his season by season record should

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:36 pm

Dwan wrote:well, his season by season record should

touche'

i just dont like wikipedia so much after i read about why we were called the mustangs. some funny guy edited it to say the first president and his gay lover called out football team a bunch of pansies who looked like a homoerotic group of mustangs.

PTI + Coker + SMU = National Recognition

PTI + Coker + SMU = National Recognition

Re: PTI + Coker + SMU = National Recognition

Re: PTI + Coker + SMU = National Recognition