Tulsa: has the tide turned?

PonySoprano · Post by **PonySoprano** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:06 pm

It wasn't that long ago when we owed Tulsa. We won 7 straight against them from 1996-2002 and even in the last four years we are 2-2 vs. Tulsa. Now we are a 24 point dog to them at home.

Why do I feel like I am stuck on the side of the highway while everyone is passing us by...

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:24 pm

Why did we ever owe Tulsa anything?

Gold · Post by **Gold** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:13 pm

I think you guys owe us a win in Dallas. :wink:

BUS · Post by **BUS** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:15 pm

The MUSTANG MILITIA will fight for you to lose.
We come to win!

:wink:

and sell shirts :wink:

Billy Joe · Post by **Billy Joe** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:32 pm

Tulsa got tired of losing so they changed their admission policies, got aggressive with $$$ and went after good coaches, and allowed the coaches to recruit from a larger pool of recruits than SMU (ie., jucos and transfers). Remember folks, SMU is not bad by accident. Junes Jones even echoed those words. Restrictive policies have hindered the talent base at SMU which has us ranked third to last in Rivals recent poll. Idaho and N. Texas are ranked lower. The positive: proven winner coach and apparently (although I have not seen much proof of it yet) less restrictive admission policies to allow the coaches to recruit juco and appeal to tranfers. Let's see what kind of transfers and juco players June Jones and company get to see if this was just more garbage thrown at the few fans left. The negative: this team is young and we may be in for some rough times ahead before we see wins.

abezontar · Post by **abezontar** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:08 am

CalallenStang wrote:Why did we ever owe Tulsa anything?

Sluts cost money, and Tulsa is a big one.

PonySoprano · Post by **PonySoprano** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:31 am

Sorry guys - I meant "owned" in my original post (but I'm sure you English majors figured that out anyway).

mrydel · Post by **mrydel** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:36 am

PonySoprano wrote:Sorry guys - I meant "owned" in my original post (but I'm sure you English majors figured that out anyway).

That's ok. You do not own us an explanation.

sail420s · Post by **sail420s** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:49 am

mrydel wrote:
PonySoprano wrote:Sorry guys - I meant "owned" in my original post (but I'm sure you English majors figured that out anyway).

That's ok. You do not own us an explanation.

A++

PK · Post by PK » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:08 pm

PonySoprano wrote:Sorry guys - I meant "owned" in my original post (but I'm sure you English majors figured that out anyway).

You do know that you can edit that post and make it correct...or not.

Captain E J Smith · Post by **Captain E J Smith** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:10 pm

PonySoprano wrote:It wasn't that long ago when we owed Tulsa. We won 7 straight against them from 1996-2002 and even in the last four years we are 2-2 vs. Tulsa. Now we are a 24 point dog to them at home.

Why do I feel like I am stuck on the side of the highway while everyone is passing us by...

It wasn't that long ago that we Ownby every body

03Mustang · Post by **03Mustang** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:23 pm

Captain E J Smith wrote:
PonySoprano wrote:It wasn't that long ago when we owed Tulsa. We won 7 straight against them from 1996-2002 and even in the last four years we are 2-2 vs. Tulsa. Now we are a 24 point dog to them at home.

Why do I feel like I am stuck on the side of the highway while everyone is passing us by...

It wasn't that long ago that we Ownby every body

booooooooo

PonySoprano · Post by **PonySoprano** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:37 pm

You guys are making me feel like a UNT graduate.

Tulsa: has the tide turned?

Tulsa: has the tide turned?

Re: Tulsa: has the tide turned?

Re: Tulsa: has the tide turned?