updated 2009 roster is up

ALEX LIFESON · Post by **ALEX LIFESON** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:00 pm

There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical

mrydel · Post by **mrydel** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:31 pm

That is one tiny team.

ALEX LIFESON · Post by **ALEX LIFESON** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:19 pm

This is pretty odd, almost all teams fudge up an inch or two, SMU goes with the real heights. Mabey JJ is trying to psych out the opposition. :wink:

Fear the vertically challenged Ponies! :twisted:

One Trick Pony · Post by **One Trick Pony** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:46 pm

ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical

Looks like a cinco de mayo party. were not big, but we could be good.

ozfan · Post by **ozfan** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:22 pm

ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical

Cunningham is now listed as a db and not a kicker.

expony18 · Post by **expony18** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:13 am

ozfan wrote:
ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical

Cunningham is now listed as a db and not a kicker.

he wont be kicking this year

PonyTales · Post by **PonyTales** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 am

ozfan wrote:
ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical

Cunningham is now listed as a db and not a kicker.

Scoops (I think) wrote that a few weeks ago.
And I was under the impression he might still kick off.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:24 am

Wow! We are shrinking!!!!

RGV Pony · Post by **RGV Pony** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:59 am

Looks like we have 20 O-linemen, 20 WRs, and 20 DE's to go with 3 DT or DL. Okay, I'm exagerrating a little.

Any conspicuous disappearances that we havent already discussed?

BUS · Post by **BUS** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:53 am

OMG - We need a herd of big men on the d-line.

From this board to GOD's ears.

Go Mustangs.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:10 am

As an offensive line comparison, Tulsa averages 6'3, 278. We average 6'3, 279.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:22 am

As a defensive line comparison, Tulsa goes 6'2.5, 261 and we go 6'3 and 283.

Cadillac · Post by **Cadillac** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:52 am

PonyTales wrote:Scoops (I think) wrote that a few weeks ago.
And I was under the impression he might still kick off.

Does this mean that our Pet Aggie will be kicking? As a True Freshman, Szymanski put a ton of kickoffs into the endzone. Hopefully his FG accuracy has climbed a bit so that we can get Loftus a redshirt year.

-CoS

jtstang · Post by **jtstang** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:06 am

As a 2008 record comparison, Tulsa went 11-3 and we went 1-11.

Point being, I guess, someday it would be nice to have size AND ability.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:19 am

Point well made. But this should put to rest the idea that we're a small team, at least on the lines where size matters most.

updated 2009 roster is up

updated 2009 roster is up

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

Re: updated 2009 roster is up