WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
User avatar
jason54858
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Around

WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by jason54858 »

User avatar
DanFreibergerForHeisman
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 16486
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
Contact:

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by DanFreibergerForHeisman »

How in the world do Texas State and UTSA afford that kind of travel?

These conferences are getting really stupid.
Shake It Off Moody
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by SoCal_Pony »

Garrett,

Would appreciate your thoughts from a WAC-member perspective.

I see this as just another death nail in the coffin of this conference.
Hfanatic
Recruit
Recruit
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: Kihei

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by Hfanatic »

its definitely on life support now.
User avatar
DaStang
Recruit
Recruit
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:41 am

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by DaStang »

Whoa there. While I don't disagree that the conference is struggling I believe that we are looking at a conference who would be in a terrible position no matter who they had added. That being said I really believe that UTSA and TxState are going to be future contenders in Texas college football. And until then, they would be great OC teams for SMU to pick up early on in the schedule instead of FCS teams.

UTSA went out and hired a coach (Larry Coker)who a little over 9 years ago won the National Championship. They have a very nice playing facility in the Alamo Dome, a large TV market and fan base whose only alternative up to this point was to support the Longhorns. I think you will see pretty quick progress from a team that won't even play a down of football until next year.

As for TxState, they have a large student body, a campus in arguably the nicest setting in the country, and they are starting phase II of stadium renovations after this season. If they could just get a head coach who actually knows how to put a program together I think they have all the ingredients to make some future noise in the WAC.

Overall I think that both of these schools will be able to really compete in the very near future. Or they may be two bottom dwellers for eternity. Who knows. :lol:
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by RGV Pony »

Decent argument for UTSA...on the other hand they could be the next UAB. Large city, not too far from two huge BCS powerhouses, big, though aging, stadium, huge student body, a lot of which commutes.
User avatar
Harry0569
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 8938
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by Harry0569 »

I just heard that due to these 3 teams joining (good for them by the way), that ESPN has signed a 10 year deal with the WAC to broadcast all of their games.

Good bye, and good night WAC.
"smupony94: Harry, you have been promoted to purveyor of official status capabilities."
User avatar
leopold
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by leopold »

DaStang wrote:Whoa there. While I don't disagree that the conference is struggling I believe that we are looking at a conference who would be in a terrible position no matter who they had added. That being said I really believe that UTSA and TxState are going to be future contenders in Texas college football. And until then, they would be great OC teams for SMU to pick up early on in the schedule instead of FCS teams.

UTSA went out and hired a coach (Larry Coker)who a little over 9 years ago won the National Championship. They have a very nice playing facility in the Alamo Dome, a large TV market and fan base whose only alternative up to this point was to support the Longhorns. I think you will see pretty quick progress from a team that won't even play a down of football until next year.

As for TxState, they have a large student body, a campus in arguably the nicest setting in the country, and they are starting phase II of stadium renovations after this season. If they could just get a head coach who actually knows how to put a program together I think they have all the ingredients to make some future noise in the WAC.

Overall I think that both of these schools will be able to really compete in the very near future. Or they may be two bottom dwellers for eternity. Who knows. :lol:


Bingo. The WAC is staying alive, it's only real option. Benson's doing about the only thing he can. Thing is, the schools he is bringing in, especially the Texas schools, are showing they are trying to compete.
In the short run, these schools provide a good working list of easy wins. In the long run, however, they are going to be solid, possibly dangerous, competition.
User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7339
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by mustangxc »

Does that bring the total to 12 FBS schools in Texas?
tristatecoog
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3007
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: WAC officially adding Denver, Texas St., UTSA

Post by tristatecoog »

mustangxc wrote:Does that bring the total to 12 FBS schools in Texas?


Yes.

UAB is a very good long term comparison to UTSA, except UAB has better academics...more like UT-D, which kind of infuriates Alabama.
Post Reply