With several good running backs and no good choice at QB...
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
-
- Scout Team
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:12 pm
With several good running backs and no good choice at QB...
What do you think about running the option?
- mrydel
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 32038
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
First, email that idea to Jones. He will probably jump right on it. But be prepared to suggest which of our fine waterbug QBs will run it.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
- smupony94
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
With several good running backs and no good choice at QB...
June bugs arch nemesis, the water bug
-
- All-American
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
You have a traditional drop-back quarterback whose game is based on his arm, not his mobility, and you want to break out the option? For a bowl game?
Got to hope that whatever was hurting McDermott (arm, foot -- whatever) feels better and that he looks more like the QB we saw in Fort Worth.
Got to hope that whatever was hurting McDermott (arm, foot -- whatever) feels better and that he looks more like the QB we saw in Fort Worth.
-
- Scout Team
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:12 pm
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
Just make Beasley the QB haha
At least he can run and throw a pass every once in a while
At least he can run and throw a pass every once in a while
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
Jay Scott or Jeremy Johnson could run the wildcat all day.
With several good running backs and no good choice at QB...
What? In the bowl game? Sure. Let's implement a totally new offense that relies on a mobile QB with our brick footed interception machine.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
Dutch wrote:What? In the bowl game? Sure. Let's implement a totally new offense that relies on a mobile QB with our brick footed interception machine.
Not nice to call our players names. The bigger deal is not using the maximum practice days. Using 10-11 practices instead of 15, would dictate we'll see the "same exciting offense zzzzzzzz that we've zzzzzz seen all zzzzz year zzzz long zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-
- Scout Team
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:12 pm
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
I was thinking more for next year rather than the bowl so we'd just put our best throwing wr as qb
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
PerunaDontCare wrote:What do you think about running the option?
and stray from our incredible high-powered offense?!
Put down the whiskey my friend
"I love coaching here at SMU University" -June Jones
- couch 'em
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
New head coach Ken Hatfield will use best
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
-EVERYONE
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
Gotcha wrote:Dutch wrote:What? In the bowl game? Sure. Let's implement a totally new offense that relies on a mobile QB with our brick footed interception machine.
Not nice to call our players names. The bigger deal is not using the maximum practice days. Using 10-11 practices instead of 15, would dictate we'll see the "same exciting offense zzzzzzzz that we've zzzzzz seen all zzzzz year zzzz long zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
i didn't call any of our players names in that specific post. i said that our QB has bricks for feet b/c he's incredibly not mobile, and he's an interception machine, because he throws a lot of interceptions (especially in the red zone). dispute those facts.
calling him McDermott would have constituted calling him a name. i didn't do that (here). i stated facts.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
- PonyPride
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 22533
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Contact:
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
Gotcha wrote:Dutch wrote:What? In the bowl game? Sure. Let's implement a totally new offense that relies on a mobile QB with our brick footed interception machine.
Not nice to call our players names. The bigger deal is not using the maximum practice days. Using 10-11 practices instead of 15, would dictate we'll see the "same exciting offense zzzzzzzz that we've zzzzzz seen all zzzzz year zzzz long zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
What do you mean? I was under the impression there will be 12 practices in Dallas and 3 in Birmingham. Did I miss something?
PonyFans.com ... is really the premier place for Mustang talk on the Web.
ΓÇö New York Times
https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/
twitter.com/PonyFans
https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/
threads.com/ponyfans_staff
ΓÇö New York Times
https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/
twitter.com/PonyFans
https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/
threads.com/ponyfans_staff
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
PonyPride wrote:Gotcha wrote:Dutch wrote:What? In the bowl game? Sure. Let's implement a totally new offense that relies on a mobile QB with our brick footed interception machine.
Not nice to call our players names. The bigger deal is not using the maximum practice days. Using 10-11 practices instead of 15, would dictate we'll see the "same exciting offense zzzzzzzz that we've zzzzzz seen all zzzzz year zzzz long zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
What do you mean? I was under the impression there will be 12 practices in Dallas and 3 in Birmingham. Did I miss something?
Sounds like PonyPride knows what he is talking about.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________

________________________Champion________________________

- westexSMU
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
- Location: Mustang Island
- Contact:
Re: With several good running backs and no good choice at QB
I'm not for running the triple option, but I have to admit that I also don't like being stuck in the run and shoot because we don't have the QB to run it next year. If you don't have the players to run that offense, you can't just say we will be run it until we get them anyway.