BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:43 pm

What is the world is going on. I wonder what the Louisville, UCONN, USF, and Cincinnati boards are saying.

StallionsModelT · Post by **StallionsModelT** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:47 pm

They are in full blown panic.

jkflamebo · Post by **jkflamebo** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:51 pm

The BE fuse has officially been lit. Hold on and hope the SMU brass is doing everything possible to make it to the big time.

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:54 pm

SMU has a 10 million dollar buyout to get out of the BE.

StallionsModelT · Post by **StallionsModelT** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:54 pm

F*ck the buyout. RUN!!!!!

mustangxc · Post by **mustangxc** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:56 pm

Ouch! I would rather have fewer teams. As long as you have 9 or 10 football schools you are good. You can always add as needed, but hard to throw teams out.

Rebel10 · Post by **Rebel10** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:01 pm

StallionsModelT wrote:F*ck the buyout. RUN!!!!!

You can just do that. Plus MWC is weak without BSU and SDSU while the CUSA is a mess.

DFW HOYA · Post by **DFW HOYA** » Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:20 pm

Don't worry about Rutgers. They will be back to 2-10 seasons real soon.

covok48 · Post by **covok48** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:54 pm

DFW HOYA wrote:Don't worry about Rutgers. They will be back to 2-10 seasons real soon.

No kidding. Wasn't it like a decade ago they were the worst football team in D-1?

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:58 pm

DFW HOYA wrote:Don't worry about Rutgers. They will be back to 2-10 seasons real soon.

They'll be laughing all the way to the bank however..............

WildBillPony · Post by **WildBillPony** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:41 pm

Before you know it, everyone currently in C-USA will be in the Big East.

gostangs · Post by **gostangs** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:17 pm

10 mil is chicken feed in this game.

I think be was really premature with tulane. A be/acc remainder is actually not a bad conference, but it's currently too big.

Peruna94&07 · Post by **Peruna94&07** » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:07 am

Why wouldn't they offer the spot to Tulsa over Tulane? I just don't see the logic. At least Tulsa has had success on the field.

mustangxc · Post by **mustangxc** » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:18 am

Peruna94&07 wrote:Why wouldn't they offer the spot to Tulsa over Tulane? I just don't see the logic. At least Tulsa has had success on the field.

New Orleans > Tulsa

NavyCrimson · Post by **NavyCrimson** » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:53 am

These decisions are based on TV markets plain & simple. You can bet the NBE commissioner is being counseled (by one or several of the networks) in each one of these invitations.

And as for SMU 'running' (away). Where to? LOL!!!

BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane

Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane