Page 1 of 1
BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:43 pm
by Rebel10
What is the world is going on. I wonder what the Louisville, UCONN, USF, and Cincinnati boards are saying.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:47 pm
by StallionsModelT
They are in full blown panic.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:51 pm
by jkflamebo
The BE fuse has officially been lit. Hold on and hope the SMU brass is doing everything possible to make it to the big time.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:54 pm
by Rebel10
SMU has a 10 million dollar buyout to get out of the BE.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:54 pm
by StallionsModelT
F*ck the buyout. RUN!!!!!
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:56 pm
by mustangxc
Ouch! I would rather have fewer teams. As long as you have 9 or 10 football schools you are good. You can always add as needed, but hard to throw teams out.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:01 pm
by Rebel10
StallionsModelT wrote:F*ck the buyout. RUN!!!!!
You can just do that. Plus MWC is weak without BSU and SDSU while the CUSA is a mess.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:20 pm
by DFW HOYA
Don't worry about Rutgers. They will be back to 2-10 seasons real soon.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:54 pm
by covok48
DFW HOYA wrote:Don't worry about Rutgers. They will be back to 2-10 seasons real soon.
No kidding. Wasn't it like a decade ago they were the worst football team in D-1?
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:58 pm
by PonySnob
DFW HOYA wrote:Don't worry about Rutgers. They will be back to 2-10 seasons real soon.
They'll be laughing all the way to the bank however..............
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:41 pm
by WildBillPony
Before you know it, everyone currently in C-USA will be in the Big East.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:17 pm
by gostangs
10 mil is chicken feed in this game.
I think be was really premature with tulane. A be/acc remainder is actually not a bad conference, but it's currently too big.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:07 am
by Peruna94&07
Why wouldn't they offer the spot to Tulsa over Tulane? I just don't see the logic. At least Tulsa has had success on the field.
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:18 am
by mustangxc
Peruna94&07 wrote:Why wouldn't they offer the spot to Tulsa over Tulane? I just don't see the logic. At least Tulsa has had success on the field.
New Orleans > Tulsa
Re: BE just replaced 10-2 Rutgers with 2-10 Tulane
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:53 am
by NavyCrimson
These decisions are based on TV markets plain & simple. You can bet the NBE commissioner is being counseled (by one or several of the networks) in each one of these invitations.
And as for SMU 'running' (away). Where to? LOL!!!