Top 5 SMU Recruits

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:15 pm

This is written by EJ Holland for DMN who is SMU's Scout Editor (and does a damn good job)

http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/colleg ... cessor.ece

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:46 am

Didn't realize Shead is only 14 inches tall.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:23 am

ponyboy wrote:Didn't realize Shead is only 14 inches tall.

Makes it easier to squeeze through the hole and explode into the open field

Red+BlueDude · Post by **Red+BlueDude** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:47 am

They're not real sticklers for accuracy over there.

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:18 am

ponyboy wrote:Didn't realize Shead is only 14 inches tall.

Or is it ten inches tall? Foot minus two?

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:46 am

Ten inches and 225 pounds. That dude would be very difficult to tackle.

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:56 am

Another non qualifier (Freddie Johnson) for SMU. Highest rated offensive lineman in the class.

ponyte · Post by **ponyte** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:25 pm

So, is this an indication of improved recruiting? Sounds like very solid players and a few can make an immedicate impact.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:38 pm

we'll end up about 72nd in total points ranking -a little lower in average per recruit maybe 78th-I'll project about the No. 75 Class in the Country-not so hot. A very small number of truly headline highly recruited recruits. Few BCS level recruits-maybe a handful as in 1 hand

Mustang11 · Post by **Mustang11** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:07 pm

I would have to agree.

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com ... lass.html/

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:19 pm

Stallion wrote:we'll end up about 72nd in total points ranking -a little lower in average per recruit maybe 78th-I'll project about the No. 75 Class in the Country-not so hot. A very small number of truly headline highly recruited recruits. Few BCS level recruits-maybe a handful as in 1 hand

does that consider the "diamonds in the rough" factor?

Treadway21 · Post by **Treadway21** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:20 pm

If nose guard is such a problem and since we seem to be set at back with Snead Niemchi and Line, and since JJ refused to play Wimbley at back, why not move him back to defense. Seems like we are wasting a player by making him a project then giving up on him.

sbsmith · Post by **sbsmith** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:39 pm

Treadway21 wrote:If nose guard is such a problem and since we seem to be set at back with Snead Niemchi and Line, and since JJ refused to play Wimbley at back, why not move him back to defense. Seems like we are wasting a player by making him a project then giving up on him.

Makes sense, June probably won't go for it.

JasonB · Post by **JasonB** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:51 pm

Or you could look at it and say that the coaches might feel we don't have a problem at ng

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:52 pm

heck I'd go ahead and give Mason Niemchi since June doesn't want to use him

Top 5 SMU Recruits

Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits

Re: Top 5 SMU Recruits