Rgiii statute?

Mustangs_Maroons · Post by **Mustangs_Maroons** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:49 pm

Couldn't help but laugh.

Rgiii - meet Doak.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:28 pm

Putting up a statue of someone that is alive is asking for trouble. See Paterno, Joe

LA_Mustang · Post by **LA_Mustang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:29 pm

Bulls did it with Jordan a LONG time ago.

Mustangs_Maroons · Post by **Mustangs_Maroons** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:31 pm

But one is jordan the greatest basketball player of all time and the other is well rgiii

LA_Mustang · Post by **LA_Mustang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:33 pm

I used the example of Jordan because CalallenStang posted that putting up a statue of someone alive was asking for trouble. I wasn't comparing RG3 to MJ.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:35 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:I used the example of Jordan because CalallenStang posted that putting up a statue of someone alive was asking for trouble. I wasn't comparing RG3 to MJ.

And I wasn't comparing RG3 to Joe Pa

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:37 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:Bulls did it with Jordan a LONG time ago.

And Bama has one of Saban.

99% of the time, it works out.

But I wouldn't endorse having a statue of anyone living.

LA_Mustang · Post by **LA_Mustang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:38 pm

Okay, not sure your point then.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:43 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:Okay, not sure your point then.

Glorifying someone who could make a huge mistake (whether intentional or not) and bring shame to your entire university/organization is spending money to take a huge risk with only a small reward

Mustangs_Maroons · Post by **Mustangs_Maroons** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:47 pm

My original point was just to demonstrate he difference in the history of the two programs. We have Doak walker. They're selling rgiii. If he warrants a statute then we can sell so much more.

Rgiii couldn't hold a jock strap to Doak or Dickerson for that matter

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:50 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
LA_Mustang wrote:Okay, not sure your point then.

Glorifying someone who could make a huge mistake (whether intentional or not) and bring shame to your entire university/organization is spending money to take a huge risk with only a small reward

Ever seen Clements Hall on the SMU campus?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:53 pm

Heisman trophy winner is a Heisman trophy winner. If you are going to mock Baylor having a Heisman winner in the modern era of college football, my guess is that for everyone one person who thinks like you do, there are probably 10 people mocking SMU for living in yesteryear and putting that statue of Doak up so many years after the fact. Let's just be proud we have some past football history to look back on. Give Baylor their due...they have a present

Mustangs_Maroons · Post by **Mustangs_Maroons** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:57 pm

Give me a break. Who in their right mind would make fun of Doak walker? Who makes fun of the all time greats???

They can sell rgiii because that is all they have. Good for them but We can sell more if the HC would give a damn.

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:00 pm

Mustangs_Maroons wrote:Give me a break. Who in their right mind would make fun of Doak walker? Who makes fun of the all time greats???

They can sell rgiii because that is all they have. Good for them but We can sell more if the HC would give a damn.

Probably easier to sell RG3 today than it is trying to sell Doak Walker.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

austinponie · Post by **austinponie** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:02 pm

My guess is they're capitalizing on momentum while they have it...

Rgiii statute?

Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?

Re: Rgiii statute?